I’m not sure what all the drama is here.
It seems we have a couple of different perspectives here.
Lets agree that is the case, and move on.

I have spoken to/talked to G on many occasion.
His helpfulness is unquestionable.
He sees things that most of us don’t.
We call those types of people visionary.

Bill Gates, Steve Jobs… they are…[Read more]

I posted charts, many in real-time, of the indicator.
Nothing more, nothing less.
The indicator continues to perform today very much the same as posted charts
Nothing more, nothing less.
In FF, I presented a theory and explained my way of implementing it. That’s it.
You continue to insist that I have to “prove” something… No, my dear, I don’t…[Read more]

Hi, theres enough proof. He doesnt need to prove anything to you, and u avoid him to skype

Best regards
W.

I see that your invite to Skype with you has had the effect of getting others (one so far) to post in your defense. But it’s only you who can present the proof for your algo.

Every swing point, or close to it, is in the charts you post. Are you saying that the predictions suddenly stop while the indicator is on, or that the predictions aren’t as accurate as your charts suggest?

I have only presented the facts as I see them, and asked you to publicly present adequate proof to back up your charts so everyone knows they…[Read more]

Every swing point, or close to it, is in the charts you post. Are you saying that the predictions suddenly stop while the indicator is on, or that the predictions aren’t as accurate as your charts suggest?

I have only presented the facts as I see them.

Stinky: Where exactly did I declare and brag about “predict every swing point”?
You use almost every possible public stage to smear my work and my name – yet refuse, consistenly, to see with your own eyes…

VlanFx: Thanks!

G.

Are you saying that what he showed you matches his posted charts, and that an ‘always in’ EA would be very very profitable?

What he showed you in just one hour cannot constitute proof that the algo can predict virtually every swing point. Impressive maybe, but not virtually every swing point. I still don’t think the algo is anywhere near THAT…[Read more]

Are you saying that what he showed you matches his posted charts, and that an ‘always in’ EA would be very very profitable?

What he showed you in just one hour cannot constitute proof that the algo can predict virtually every swing point. Impressive maybe, but not virtually every swing point. I still don’t think the algo is anywhere near THAT…[Read more]

Are you saying that what he showed you matches his posted charts, and that an ‘always in’ EA would be very very profitable?

What he showed you in just one hour cannot constitute proof that the algo can predict virtually every swing point. Impressive maybe, but not virtually every swing point. I still don’t think the algo is THAT effective, since…[Read more]

Hi everybody,

Today I had a call with GG53 and all I can say is WOW.
I’ve been following him on the old and then the new thread at FF, at the steve hopewood forum and now here. So when he offered to skype him with any questions regarding is arrow, I did.
I contacted him not because I wanted him to prove his GT arrow to me, but because I needed…[Read more]

All our communications will only take place in an open forum. Please stop avoiding posting to myfxbook with a Skype invite. No one anyone posts here can definitively prove your algo. Only you can do that.

It is correct that you don’t have to prove anything. However please prove that you haven’t been fooling everyone by posting to…[Read more]

All our communications will only take place in an open forum. Please stop avoiding posting to myfxbook with a Skype invite. No one anyone posts here can definitively prove your algo. Only you can do that.

It is correct that you don’t have to prove anything. However please prove that you haven’t been fooling everyone by posting to…[Read more]

Stinky, you are very much mistaken.
I don’t have to prove anything.
From first post:
“…The purpose of this thread is to further explore the ability to rationally and consistently predict major SWING points in Forex trading.”
later on:
“Our target is to find major SWING points in the forex market, to pinpoint accurately entry and exit point for…[Read more]

I do not see how ‘always in’ is stupid. Anyone can see it would be profitable if the algo actually works.

gg53 wrote:
‘If you look at past results (actual real time charts) of the predictions – you will notice profitable results even with poor money management…’
‘The most profitable (pips wise) is the M15’

Given ok volatility I would say the…[Read more]

It’s you who are evasing the issue.
You claimed “cherry-picking” – why not confront that in live session?
You claimed “Cluster” – why not confront that in live session?
“…assuming it is real…” – you are invited to see, check, ask, record the session, and repeat it with some other qualified person.

Confront your claims, and I’ll even show you…[Read more]