Ok, something has changed with the new version: we’re having a constant output = 0 now when calling via iCustom().

When calling the lib directly it remains a constant -12.

I’ve had an idea regarding iCustom() use: the EA is executed using timeframe H4, but your news indicator requires lower timeframes to display correctly. So that version can’t…[Read more]

@fuzzy: just found your new PM with the new code you sent me minutes ago – thanks! Will give it a quick try and report back.

I’m still working on the integration of the news calendar lib in our EA, having tried two versions: one function calling the calendar lib directly, and one calling the impact indicator via iCustom(). None of them are working by now.

Attaching the indicator to a chart manually works fine: news are updated and levels are displayed.…[Read more]

Yeah, sure… RZ is working with high accuracy.

Just look at the EURCHF weekly chart from last year till today.

It went down from the 1.20 peg for ~11,000 pips, and 57 weeks later (more than a year…) it’s marching back, slooowly.

Will it be back to 1.20? I’m sure it will, sometime… so hang on to that position and DD, Brokers went broke, b…[Read more]

Yeah, sure… RZ is working with high accuracy.

Just look at the EURCHF weekly chart from last year till today.

It went down from the 1.20 peg for ~11,000 pips, and 57 weeks later (more than a year…) it’s marching back, slowly.

Will it be back to 1.20? I’m sure it will, sometime… so hang on with that position and DD, Brokers went broke,…[Read more]

The probability depends on the input parameters chosen, see my post over here and the following posts. You can achieve 97 % under any market condition if you’re willing to wait long enough.

I would consider that statement as rather trivial, at least when taken literally. What’s its value?

Why take the open price of a certain candle into account? We already discussed that somewhere. It’s just an arbitrary choice because we need some point in time to start an analytic interval. And if it’s arbitrary, it might be discussed to choose…[Read more]

I fully agree to your doubts.

Using analogies between price dynamics and mechanical dynamics of physical bodies is always dangerous. It’s ok to use a certain word, e.g. ‘momentum’, to describe some effects in both worlds. But it’s dangerous nonsense to believe that if you use one word for two different things the math behind is the same in both…[Read more]

With VlanFx & simplex & fuzzy we couldn’t be in better hands.

Many, many thanks !!

G.

Have a good trip, @VlanFx!

Ok then, give me two days or so. Will call for assistance by @andymack aka fuzzy for the implementation. Don’t have much experience with the OOP approach.

s.

Have a good trip, @VlanFx!

Ok then, give me two days or so. Will call for assistance by <a href="@andymack“>@fuzzy for the implementation. Don’t have much experience with the OOP approach.

s.

I think it’s Ok to convert to your style and @VlanFx will adapt to that style later on. That will save precious time, and later on you can both coordinate published versions.

Many thanks to all contributing members.

G.

@VlanFx:

Thanks for your faith in me! As you can easily see from the code I sent you recently, my coding style is quite different from yours. I would feel more confident basing my further work on the version I sent you for review, not on yours. But I’m afraid that might introduce a major break in our overall workflow. Please do not take this a…[Read more]

Testing some indicators today … thanks for nice indicators mates

may be tomorrow NFP is the show time ??

[ deleted : double posted … sorry]

Yep:

This works – thanks for it!

s.

Ok:

… and do you like this kind of work? I for myself try to avoid it.

s.