<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Market Oracle Forum | Felix | Activity</title>
	<link>https://forum.marketoracle.io/members/fflx/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://forum.marketoracle.io/members/fflx/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Felix.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:01:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b04db5c839b166ac9a98ddf3a02b62aa</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13347</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 22:00:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me, that won&#8217;t be necessary if it is in German. But maybe some others are also interested. Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a0feb3b16b4ddb136a752f446964e1b4</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13336</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the ~93% probability is only true if the numbers are generated by a random process (not independent random numbers as the theorem says, then it would be ~83%, anyway&#8230;) and, more important, only if you look at the complete 5-sequence after being formed, not during its formation. If you scan for sequences where only a subset of the equations&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19997"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13336" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1d31741956077eb2cc10913cb3d1b153</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13336</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the ~93% probability is only true if the numbers are generated by a random process (not independent random numbers as the theorem says, then it would be ~83%, anyway&#8230;) and, more important, only if you look at the complete 5-sequence after being formed, not during its formation. If you scan for sequences where only a subset of the equations&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19996"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13336" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">66366f6104d8782a4819da82468e4550</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13330</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:42:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><span><a href='http://penguintraders.com/members/anti/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Anti</a></span></span></p>
<p>Just a personal note: I honestly appreciate your patience and thoroughness investigating Eurusdds fragments of a concept. However, don&#8217;t take them too seriously. If you gathered any valuable insights based on those threads (I think you did), it is likely that they are an outcome of your very own research inspired by some of his remarks and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19988"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/5/#post-13330" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">72b23f5a0c0f73fc45c26a6214c278c4</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 04:07:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://penguintraders.com/members/anti/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Anti</a></p>
<p>Thanks for your extensive reply. I think I understand your encoding but I disagree with the implicit assumpion of a uniform distribution of binary combinations. Computing the relative frequency with (32 – 2) / (32) requires that each binary pattern occurs with the same probability of 1/32. As you pointed out, at least one inequation (i) &#8211; (&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19834"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29e5f00cea872f069e5570cf1522b90f</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 04:07:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://penguintraders.com/members/anti/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Anti</a></p>
<p>Thanks for your extensive reply. I think I understand your encoding but I disagree with the implicit assumpion of a uniform distribution of binary combinations. Computing the relative frequency with (32 – 2) / (32) requires that each binary pattern occurs with the same probability of 1/32. As you pointed out, at least one inequation (i) &#8211; (&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19833"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6b4ff2406b8a03178ce211ee6bf3c91b</guid>
				<title>Felix replied to the topic The similarity system - discussion in the forum General Discussions</title>
				<link>http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 04:07:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://penguintraders.com/members/anti/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Anti</a></p>
<p>Thanks for your extensive reply. I think I understand your encoding but I disagree with the implicit assumpion of a uniform distribution of binary combinations. Computing the relative frequency as (32 – 2) / (32) requires that each binary pattern occurs with the same probability of 1/32. As you pointed out, at least one inequation (i) &#8211; (&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-19832"><a href="http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-similarity-system-discussion/page/4/#post-13256" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">963813ac1413cf12c8a7b157a636b044</guid>
				<title>Felix became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://forum.marketoracle.io/activity/p/19821/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 19:37:48 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>