Ok, we went to the wilderness and watch a river flow. The National Park authorities put a sign stating that the river is 60 feet deep.

How do we figure out what’s the river-bed contour looks like? and what about some levels above the bottom, since it’s probably not just straight walls?

Ahhh, we have a Sonar. We built one in the previous few…[Read more]

Ok, we went to the wilderness and watch a river flow. The National Park authorities put a sign stating that the river is 60 feet deep.

How do we figure out what’s the river-bed contour looks like? and what about some levels above the bottom, since it’s probably not just straight walls?

Ahhh, we have a Sonar. We built one in the previous few…[Read more]

So after absorbing and understaning the above – here comes the practical side:

1. Price moves like water or rivers – you can read about it in Hurst’s work and my other postings on that subject. It means it flows where it’s easy and there is less obstacles.

2. Water/River flows according to the landscape beneath it. If you open a damm the water…[Read more]

So after absorbing and understaning the above – here comes the practical side:

1. Price moves like water or rivers – you can read about it in Hurst’s work and my other postings on that subject. It means it flows where it’s easy and there is less obstacles.

2. Water/River flows according to the landscape beneath it. If you open a damm thge water…[Read more]

Sampling rate is important in Ehlers MTF, and should be equaly spaced.

Something like M15-M30-H1 (which is x2 spaced), or M15-H1-H4 (which is x4 spaced).

G.

You should view some of his works in MTF, one on top of the other.

If you use 3 TF’s, you will see 3 different  sine-like “waves” – and watch when they coincide.

G.

You should view some of his works in MTF.

G.

On Video #42 (NFP):

The solution was already given…

Draw a channel, PRIOR to the news, on Gadi_OBV and enter a Buy/Sell Stop order.

G.

Check the EURJPY after the news. Same thing…

G.

The “Channel” uses the RANGE (length) of a price bar, and not the choppy and chaotic OHLC.

It’s effective in all TimeFrames and doesn’t lag.

It’s also (or mainly) effective because it is based on a basic statistical concept: if two distributions doesn’t overlap, they can be considered different.

G.

In down-swing, some candles LOW is lower than the previous candles LOW in that swing, some are not.

But…

A candle LOW is always lower than all the previous candles HIGH, and this is the invariant for a down-swing.

If a candle breaks this rule, it starts an up-swing. It’s the basic nature of any bar-chart, so you don’t need parameters or ind…[Read more]

In down-swing, some candles LOW is lower than the previous candles LOW in that swing, some are not.

But…

A candle LOW is always lower than all the previous candles HIGH, and this is the invariant for a down-swing.

If a candle breaks this rule, it starts an up-swing. It is the base nature of any bar-chart, so you don’t need parameters or ind…[Read more]

In down-swing, some candles LOW is lower than the previous candles LOW in that swing, some are not.

But…

A candle LOW is always lower than all the previous candles HIGH, and this is the invariant for a down swing.

If a candle breaks this rule, it starts an up-swing. It is the base nature of any bar chart, so you don’t need any parameter or…[Read more]

Sorry, but we are NOT on the same page. I have no interest in this “method” or “investigation” or “research”.

I can count and specify many reasons, but I’ll explain just one:

Most, if not all, peaks & troughs are a simple overshoot of “fools money”, trying to follow and ride the previous, already finished trend.

And I can prove it…[Read more]

Attached is 29 Oct 2015 to 6 Nov 2015.

My choice of date range #1 is same as above.

My choice of date range #2 is also same as above.

I’m not in the proper mood to “Pass this verification” or any other “verifications” for that matter.

G.

Sorry, but I’m not into “following price” or its action.

Price is a “shadow”, or result, of other things (or causes).

G.

Good to see you back here. We missed you !!

G.

Here’s a sample implementation:
The “rules” or recommendatio are completly wrong and in opposite direction.
The ABCD points resembles kind of Elliot & Fibonacci “patterns”, which in your other book, the author said:
…”

Evidence Based Technical Analysis  rejects all subjective, interpretive methods of Technical Analysis as worse than wrong, beca…[Read more]

Here’s a sample implementation:
The “rules” or recommendatio are completly wrong and in opposite direction.
The ABCD points resembles kind of Elliot & Fibonacci “patterns”, which in your other book, the author said:
…”

Evidence Based Technical Analysis  rejects all subjective, interpretive methods of Technical Analysis as worse than wrong, beca…[Read more]

Relativity,

You are researching and posting this in many forums since at least 2011.

What’s your actual purpose in this?

G.