“too many coincidences” … yes it is a nice term …
Thanks for the new geometrical lines brother, top blue line is a good target … but i think she will go to south for a small retrace first to day, before she continue to reach her target at the top blue line this week …

Like coding and typing?

s.

Good job:

Thanks for that – I just missed to do it.

Your mods seem to be ok. Only did a brief code review (I don’t need prefix and suffix). Please let me know if there are any more problems.

s.

Thank you very much to @GG53 & @Simplex. This is really great …
I am trying to add the “prefix” and “postfix” to simplex’s code. Quick and dirty, so if there is any bugs , please let me know.

Edit:
Some note: After i attached this modified indicator to MT4, from “expert” tab i can see all major currency are prepared, from  AUD(0) to…[Read more]

Thank you very much to @GG53 & @Simplex. This is really great …
I am trying to add the “prefix” and “postfix” to simplex’s code. Quick and dirty, so if there is any bugs , please let me know.

Edit:
Some note: After i attached this modified indicator to MT4, from “expert” tab i can see all major currency are prepared, from  AUD(0) to…[Read more]

Thank you very much to @GG53 & @Simplex. This is really great …
I am trying to add the “prefix” and “postfix” to simplex’s code. Quick and dirty, so if there is any bugs , please let me know.

You are really great Brother …. Drachi did it exactly like your SSS prediction told us …  

Thanks Lowphat, will look inside it.

Thanks G. This is the new version, trying to put “dot” at the time Volume(blue/red) >= average (realtime).  Still have problem for previous bars (still need to create an MTF version of Gadi_NormalizeVolume / sx_VolumePerSession ), to call the “approximately” price the blue/red volume >= its average on TF M1.

@Anti:

No, not yet. And won’t have time today.

s.

For me, ‘instead’ of coffee is not an option …

… an interesting article ‘and’ a cup of coffee can make a stimulating Sunday morning. See here for medical details:

http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/the-take-a-break-from-serious-business-thread/page/3/#post-9645

Best,

s.

And one more thing to mention: in the source code posted by G. a link to a conceptual article by Waleed Aly Khalil was included:

http://www.ifta.org/public/files/journal/d_ifta_journal_09.pdf

I already downloaded that IFTA Journal more than a year ago, but only regarded a John Ehlers article worth reading in detail. Not a good choice, right?

s.

Less than 2k of code … best things in life seem to follow the KISS rule!

Thanks @tankhang & @gg53.

s.

Great job – thanks for that:

I assume your analysis is based on classical OHLC of M1 and not on tick data, and the logic of up / down volume is the same as discussed here – correct?

In my opinion the results described in your last paragraph are the most interesting ones. In your definition of range5 = close-open do you mean the signed value or…[Read more]

Sorry guys, didn’t make it yesterday! Found a bug late in the evening. This indicator requires ticks coming in to work, so debugging will be done on Monday.

I’ll post my code after debugging.

s.

@Anti:

Hope you’ll stay tuned! You don’t have to be an experienced coder to contribute valuable conceptional thoughts. And maybe your R skills and my mql skills could be an interesting combination. I’m still thinking about that possible volume vs. price movement correlation. Analyzed in R and coded in mql this could be pretty powerful.

And…[Read more]

In my intrabar volume indicator, a new unit ‘points per tick’ is introduced, see bottom indicator in pic attached.

Also extending the time window is possible now by input parameter. The pic shows an example of 5 minutes history at 1 sample per second.

Sample rate can be reduced now, default is still 1 bar per second.

Indicator will be published…[Read more]

G:

Bars disappear because I’m currently watching a rolling time window of 64 seconds, sampled 1 bar per second. When a certain bar has passed this window from right to left, it will disappear.

As I stated: this window could easily be extended if a larger sample makes sense. Would cost some additional cpu and memory resources and lead to longer…[Read more]

G, following this statement of yours …

… would you say it makes sense to take my prototype posted here and use it as a blueprint to exploit tick data further?

At the moment, this prototype indi is nothing more than a proof of concept that recent tick data can be stored in a data structure alongside with price data and very basic stats…[Read more]

Thanks for clarifying:

So, in this model, zero efficiency (doji) is represented by a value of 0.5, while max. efficiency (no wicks) by a value of 1.0.

When dividing body size by bar range, zero efficiency is 0.0, while max. efficiency is 1.0.

Both scales appear to be linear, so there’s not much of a difference.

s.