the only thing i found useful in the sim thread was that it makes you look at price action around inefficient market moves. this put me on the path of Order Flow. I just want to be sitting in a pile of imbalanced orders regardless of what various stats or indicators say about the next bar because it’s the imbalanced orders that move price  …[Read more]

the only thing i found useful in the sim thread was that it makes you look at price action around inefficient market moves. this put me on the path of Order Flow. I just want to be sitting in a pile of imbalanced orders regardless of what various stats or indicators say about the next bar   :)    this can end up being the most important thing you…[Read more]

interesting topic.

i would say, for me personally, candlesticks give me the positive effect of seeing ohlc of for example : weeks, days, quarters , easy and quick.

i think these levels are important. Price (or the traders) react at those levels quite often.

i ve puzzled some time with the statement that there´s a mathematical edge in ohlc of…[Read more]

let me clarify the image i posted was just something that looked interesting . i was noticing when all OSC’s get above say 20%  with the majority above 50% the potential fractal had way less chance of running a full 6 bars before a true fractal top/bot. my live trading method is more about trading a pullback back past a mid fractal if the long…[Read more]

was messing around with zz confluence. just for fun using 10 random oscillators/settings and waiting for the majority to gravitate above a percentage line.

each one falls into a mild supply/demand origin for another point of confluence.

if dissimilarity is just divergence couldn’t it be a similar concept to mean reversion?

also the lowest TF could potentially always be the blueprint as its the origin of everything after it

if dissimilarity is just divergence couldn’t it be a similar concept to mean reversion?

few spots above seem to be taking a long time to resolve

@simplex good call. @gg53 you may can just change near line 438

if (useLowphatAlterateDrawMethod)
{
double b1,b2;
if (displayAUD){bAUD[shift]=phatCalcAUD[shift+1]-phatCalcAUD[shift+2];//change these lines to this?

@simplex good call. @gg53 you may can just change near line 438

if (useLowphatAlterateDrawMethod)
{
double b1,b2;
if (displayAUD){bAUD[shift]=phatCalcAUD[shift+1]-phatCalcAUD[shift+2];//change these lines to this?

@simplex good call. you may can just change near line 438

if (useLowphatAlterateDrawMethod)
{
double b1,b2;
if (displayAUD){bAUD[shift]=phatCalcAUD[shift+1]-phatCalcAUD[shift+2];//change these lines to this?

i did something like this but i dont know if it works with the original. ill attach my rough hack    cname = “CIX_v_2_2_post-PHaT-Mod-all”

ExtMapBuffer1=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer2=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+2 )…[Read more]

i did something like this but i dont know if it works with the original. ill attach my rough hack

ExtMapBuffer1=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer2=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer3=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,2,i+1…[Read more]

i did something like this but i dont know if it works with the original. ill attach my rough hack

ExtMapBuffer1=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer2=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer3=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,2,i+1…[Read more]

@Anti

as for 13 when i try a lower number my MT4 bugs out . also its a good compromise between seeing enough data on my screen and having a lower than 1 min TF to check if price has only hit one within H left

13 tick chart. lots of fun

13 tick chart. lots of fun

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability and point “B” is nowhere near 0.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?