My answer to a question raised about high probability in latest Skype session:

If the market opened in the lower 20% of its daily range and closed in the upper 80% of its daily range,

a SELL setup is of high probability for the next day (vice versa for BUY).

[Night data (my TimeZone – NY Close till EU Open) is ignored. The range should be crea…[Read more]

My answer to a question raised about high probability in latest Skype session:

If the market opened in the lower 20% of its daily range and closed in the upper 80% of its daily range,

a SELL setup is of high probability for the next day (vice versa for BUY).

[Night data (my TimeZone – NY Close till EU Open) is ignored. The range should be crea…[Read more]

My answer to a question raised about high probability in latest Skype session:
If the market opened in the lower 20% of its daily range and closed in the upper 80% of its daily range,
a SELL setup is of high probability for the next day (vice versa for BUY).

G.
 

When you “judge” some prediction as “nonsense” – you are actually saying that YOU are predicting the opposite….

You should ask yourself, in those cases, how did you come to that blind, “definite” prediction of yours… and what is your historical blind “predictions” track record…

G.

If you read carefully you’ll find an explanation and response to Q’s. There is no average there – only true pips/money flowing from one currency to the other – on all 7 “pipes” or “tubes”.

Since I don’t D/L or use ex4 indies I will never know how “anything better than this” it really is.

Enjoy and good luck. Green pips to…[Read more]

You can try my Skype (ggfx_ggfx), if you want…

G.

Yes, but more like an Euclidean vectors, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the math is the same for direction and force, but the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to…[Read more]

Yes, but more like an Euclidean vectors, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the math is the same for direction and force, but the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to…[Read more]

Yes, but more like an Euclidean vectors, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the math is the same for direction and force, but the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to…[Read more]

Yes, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to notice and research that behaviour – resulting in Hurst Exponent – that was later used in…[Read more]

Yes, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to notice and research that behaviour – resulting in Hurst Exponent – that was later used in…[Read more]

Yes, with one exception:

When the vectors “collide” (or “meet”) the resulting vector start behaving like fluid, with distinct direction and turbulances at the “river bank” edges.

I think that Harold Edwin Hurst (British hydrologist) was the first one to notice and research that behaviour – Hurst Exponent – that was later used in…[Read more]

I think you are on the same path as me…

Look at my posted detailed trade results (almost 1 yr. backtest – http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/nature-of-markets-power-of-probability-compounding-1pip/page/8/#post-7482) and you might find and answer and solve your DD problems…

G.

I think you are on the same path as me…

Look at my posted detailed trade results (almost 1 yr. backtest) and you might find and answer and solve your DD problems…

G.

I can only repeat my previous statement:

There is NO such thing as TREND in a currency pair.

The “TREND” in EURUSD, for example, is the sum vectors of EUR vector (“trend”) and USD vector (“trend”). Very much the same as vector calc in Physics.

Once understanding the above – it’s quite easy to make a profitable trading strategy from…[Read more]

I can only repeat my previous statement:

There is NO such thing as TREND in currency pair.

The “TREND” in EURUSD, for example, is the sum vectors of EUR vector and USD vector.

Once understanding the above – it’s quite easy to make a profitable trading strategy from that.

G.