@Ephisi: I meant if you could explain your tests on countertrend trading with TZs. I invite you to post it here, too … But to be honest, if I’d be a good mql4 programmer, I would implement your idea. Unfortunately, I’m not …

I believe you. However, what was your strategy you’ve tested? Could you please explain?!

Hi @Pigh77,

I’d be glad if you’d write something about your test. I invite you to post it here as this is Ephisis thread.

Hi

honestly I think you can trade against the trend with TZ with a wider stop loss and assuming that a trend will destroy part of your profits. In a backtest from 2009 (15 min) there weren’t so strong trends able to destroy profits made bar after bar against the TZs. 

Thus, I assume it’s more like a trend trading rather than a reversal strategy, right?

Thus, I assume it’s more like a trend trading rather than a reversal strategy, richt?

Hi ephisi, may I ask if you use matured TZs or PTZs in your strategy. I believe that the original idea was to trade the revisit of formerly matured TZs …

Hi ephisi, welcome at penguintraders.com. May I ask if you use matured TZs or PTZs in your strategy. I believe that the original idea was to trade the revisit of formerly matured TZs …

Hi ephisi, welcome at penguintraders.com. May I ask if you use matured TZs or PTZs in your strategy. I believe that the originally idea was to trade the revisit of formerly matured TZs …

For anyone using mt4 and having to eventually recode indicators to suit mt5 this is going to be a pain

I have never used mt5 so cannot comment on whether it is more desirable, does it have more bells and whistles ???

Pip

Thanks, @xux99.

You don’t have to sign up in order to view all contents. The videos are hosted via youtube.

Machine learning for trading is a free course to enhance your algorithmic skills. This course introduces students to the real world challenges of implementing machine learning based trading strategies including the algorithmic steps from information gathering to market orders. The focus is on how to apply probabilistic machine learning approaches…[Read more]

Great link. Thanks a lot!

Great link. Thank you for it!

Due to some reasons I was not able to attach the second file. Thus …

Ok, in that case I’ll post it in German first. If someone is really interested, I can try to clear all points … Attached you should find two documents – a pdf with some explanatory notes as well as an image which should be also useful for others to understand the theorem

Will translate it to English and post it here tomorrow.

Yes, it is. I deciphered it before three months. It just says that there should be two stochastic processes that agree almost surely. A contradition can only occur if values generated by both processes are not bijective (see my former post with the stochastic indicator as explanatory example). It doesn’t give any clue why prize should return to…[Read more]

Yes, it is. I deciphered it before three months. It just says that there should be two stochastic processes that agree almost surely. A contradition can only occur if values generated by both processes are not bijective (see my former post). It doesn’t give any clue why prize should return to those contradicting prize levels. If you’re interested…[Read more]