No problem at all We are all here to help each other out 

Looks great! You got a lot of talent my friend!

2015 I’m sure will be an amazing year for all of us. I really believe that the more we give, the more we receive so I highly encourage all to share and help each other grow. And I appreciate all the contributions to this…[Read more]

Thank you dtlase for bringing this up, I will go and reread ff thread.

cheers

hannele

Yep that worked, thanks

h

Looking forward to it SaverO

cheers

hannele

Great AKCodingEye, subscribed

cheers,

hannele

I can not find it either…. maybe it is yet to come …

Subscribed

Watch out for for those SweetSpots !!

Those are known areas for traders to wait for breakout.

The problem is that others know this also, and will use it against you – and it’s not the brokers. they will push the price up for small “fake” breakout, and than drops it by 50-60-70 pips to gather retailers StopLoss.

After that the price will really…[Read more]

Just to give an idea. For EURJPY, M5 with H=20, the probability of success is about 98% for K = 3pips 

When k = 10pips, probability drops to 95%, still not bad 
But like I said, the problem remains with the SL. That’s the flaw of this method. With SL I’m not sure if it would be as profitable. And without SL, it has the chance of bl…[Read more]

Just to give an idea. For EURJPY, M5 with H=20, the probability of success is about 98% for K = 3pips 

When k = 10pips, probability drops to 95%, still not bad 

Just to give an idea. For EURJPY, M5 with H=20, the probability of success is about 98% for K = 3pips 

When k = 10pips, probability drops to 95%, still not bad

Maybe some kind of an ATR based filter? Where the bar size is limited by the ATR. For example, if the ATR is 4pips and the current bar is 6pips, then it would be recorded as 4pips for analysis purposes. This would kind of smooth out the “noise” I would think.

Thank you Simplex. Most times I just hack something up real quick to just test out an idea that I forget to make it more user friendly since its just for me. I will try to be more user contious next time and thank you for making this edit and posting it  I will add it to the zip and attach it to the main post.

Great idea! I will try to…[Read more]

No I haven’t read through their stuff but I have seen the site. I just now glanced through it. It looks very good but might be a bit introductory for some. Babypips is the place that I started from

Over the past few days, I have been thinking a lot and started looking at candles with a whole new light. It actually seems pretty easy to read…[Read more]

By width, I’m assuming you mean the height in terms of price and not time, right?

Also it’s not the X,T(t) that’s subtracted or added from K, its K that is subtracted or added to X,T(t) since K is the constant.

I mean, this equation is crystal clear to me, EURUSDD laid it out very clearly what he meant. That the price that exists within X,T(t)…[Read more]

By width, I’m assuming you mean the height in terms of price and not time, right?

Also it’s not the X,T(t) that’s subtracted or added from K, its K that is subtracted or added to X,T(t) since K is the constant.

I mean, this equation is crystal clear to me, EURUSDD laid it out very clearly what he meant. That the price that exists within X,T(t)…[Read more]

Rhimseven, I actually take it back. I’m not sure if I can agree with what you said in your figure. I think I replied without thinking too much because your figure is almost accurately representing the equation, just need a small fix based on the way I understand it whats stated.

If I am to turn EURUSDD’s equation into written text, it should s…[Read more]

Oh man! Perfect! You beat me to it.. hehe
Thanks for clearing this up for me before as well!

By the way, I 100% agree with Rahimseven’s explanation. This is valid according to the way I understand the equation and its a perfect example 

——————————–

Guys, try not to over complicate things
Let’s try to understand his equation. What EURUSDD was talking about should be crystal clear so there is nothing to be…[Read more]

Guys, try not to over complicate things
Let’s try to understand his equation. What EURUSDD was talking about should be crystal clear so there is nothing to be confused about. He explained it with this simple formula:

So what this is saying is that the price g is contained within Xt(t) – k and Xt(t) + k. And this is what this statement lo…[Read more]