ForexGT_TickVolume_Divergence:
Dots are marked (no repaint) AFTER next bar close.
Same with normal or hidden divergence line.

G.

ForexGT_TickVolume_Divergence:
Dots are marked (no repaint) AFTER next bar close.

G.

Are those Ticks per bar as I suggested?
It sure folowed by signifact move.

G.

Attached…Same Indie, with buffer 0 only, with direction lines, peak & Trough marking, and divergence (Red=Normal, Yellow=Hidden)
It requires the original one in “Indicators” folder.

G.

Attached…Same Indie, with buffer 0 only, with direction lines, peak & Trough marking, and divergence (Red=Normal, Yellow=Hidden)

G.

I know, not my fault, though…

The indicator or EA that creates the offline Renko doesn’t support the “Volume” datafeed. Most of them ignore this data…

That’s why I needed to create my own Renko offline EA…. This can be easily fixed by the creator of this EA, or provide source code for us to “fix”.

G.

Small tip: If you count the Tick_Volume (number of ticks per bar)  for the TF you are on – you will find out that if your count for a certain bar is more than 130-150% the normal – this is an area of Supply/Demand even before that bar ends and surely before the next bar.

It’s easy to create such an indie, separate window or on-chart.

Use it.

G.

It’s attachec as .ex4 file, not HTML file – or am I missing something?

G.

Let me contribute the Tick_volume indie here – instead or in addition to Bull/Bear.

It shows clearly the crossing of the zero line, but more importantly it shows where that move begins.

G.

Let me contribute the Tick_volume indie here – instead or in addition to Bull/Bear.

It shows clearly the crossing of the zero line, but more importantly it shows where that move begins.

G.

Refering to your picture and combining the “water flow” theory/model (used in some “recycled bin” thread, somewhere…):

Whenever HIGH channel line change direction from up to down – next bars closes DOWN.

Whenever LOW channel line change direction from down to up  – next bars closes UP.

(Only for the first time of change & don’t trade huge b…[Read more]

Refering to your picture and combining the “water flow” theory/model (used in some “recycled bin” thread, somewhere…):

Whenever HIGH channel line change direction from up to down – next bars closes DOWN.

Whenever LOW channel line change direction from down to up  – next bars closes UP.

(Only for the first time of change)

Very, very s…[Read more]

Refering to your picture and combining the “water flow” theory/model (used in some “recycled bin” thread, somewhere…):

Whenever HIGH channel line change direction from up to down – next bars closes DOWN.

Whenever LOW channel line change direction from down to up  – next bars closes UP.

Very, very simple…

G.

Refering to your picture and combining the “water flow” theory/model (used in some “recycle bin”, somewhere…):

Whenever HIGH channel line change direction from up to down – next bars closes DOWN.

Whenever LOW channel line change direction from down to up  – next bars closes UP.

Very, very simple…

G.

I’m curious about it too.

I can’t find any foul language or offending anybody – except a little argument about “repainting” fractals with Xaphod.

BTW: the next day he opened a new thread, “copying previous thread by owners request/permission” and went on discussing fractals “his way”…

Needless to say, no request or permission ever…[Read more]

I’m in.

Fascinating sunject!

Need to catch up, Hope I can contribute.

G.