@Anti

as for 13 when i try a lower number my MT4 bugs out . also its a good compromise between seeing enough data on my screen and having a lower than 1 min TF to check if price has only hit one within H left

13 tick chart. lots of fun

13 tick chart. lots of fun

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability and point “B” is nowhere near 0.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability abd point “B” is nowhere near 0.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

@Anti

there is a 97% chance he doesn’t trade for a living.

@Anti it’s almost as if someone read a forum somewhere and displays the info as it’s his work without citing sources.

there is a 97% chance he doesn’t trade for a living.

A video on prime numbers, markets ans recurrence …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxlVASqki4o

Do you want to discuss it? For instance, how are prime numbers related to the market?

the icustom shows mtf without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization so you can ignore the messages above :)

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now (with mtf icustom) without having to use the super high Period RSI n…[Read more]

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization so y…[Read more]

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization.

also here is the mod i’m using. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for testing

also here is the mod i’m using. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

yes i have the suffix entered. it draws with low rsi period but not a high one. when i put a number in deltaInit +=  i can get it to draw with a higher rsiPeriod though. what im trying to do is see a much higher period/time-frame strength to see how useful it is in going in that direction only for supply demand or other methods. im going to try a…[Read more]

@Anti yes it does not have to be related. you can use anything that shows a fresh strong move but mid gaps will always give you a hint of a strong move. if there isn’t a mid gap it doesnt mean a strong move started from a fresh zone doesnt exist :)  but if your eye is not trained to see strong moves the mid tz gaps can help flag a potential str…[Read more]

@Anti yes it does not have to be related. you can use anything that shows a fresh strong move but mid gaps will always give you a hint of a strong move. if there isn’t a mid gap it doesnt mean a strong move started from a fresh zone doesnt exist :)  but if your eye is not trained to see strong moves the mid tz gaps can help flag a potential str…[Read more]

Hi Lowphat,

let’s start some conversation. I don’t see why the “unfilled order” theory should be related to TZs – even if we ignore mid-TZs. If some big orders get filled doesn’t automatically mean that prize will rise quickly. Prize can also move slowly (it all depends on recent market orders and its directions …).