gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Thanks all for your comments, but I asked for suggestions/ideas on how to achieve the task presented in the first post.
There are several NN aproaches, and there are some other ways of doing it.
I’m looking for such – not relying on just one “engine” which might be not very suitable for the mission.
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
I’m getting better results with ATR between 80-100.
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Try to multiply your ATR by 4, i.e. 4*20=80
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
I very much like all kind of “channels” because they give you a definite “area” with boundries to focus on.
So if you are consistantly aiming at the center of that channel – you are not far away from target – and that’s a start. From that point it’s just a matter of refining the accuracy.
I tested many types of “channels” (Bollinger, Keltner, v…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
I very much like all kind of “channels” because they give you a definite “area” with boundries to focus on.
So if you are consistantly aiming at the center of that channel – you are not far away from target – and that’s a start. From that point is just a matter of refining the accuracy.
I tested many types of “channels” (Bollinger, Keltner, v…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
I think I’ve already said that the target is just one TF (Preferably H4).
G.
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – TZ and her friends for manual trading all TF in the forum Trading Systems – Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Hi Brother,
Actually ForexGT_Tick Volume from GG53 use 6 buffers, but yes value that show at data window only one.., if you open the setting and go to Colors Tab, you will see that there was 5 buffers from 0 to 4, and in ‘her’ calculation use 1 extra buffer to store bias/current trend direction.
If you want to ‘call’ this buffers with…[Read more]
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – TZ and her friends for manual trading all TF in the forum Trading Systems – Development 11 years, 4 months ago
My Brother,
The ‘alarm’ part is still not as good as ‘Skull and Star’. And Yes, Hi/Lo marker for this TVI is ‘lag’ for 2 candles, and that is intended to do like that.., later if I’m done with ‘set up’ for you (because you’re longer term trader, then I create for H4 and D1)… you will understand why we need that ‘lag’.
Happy Trad…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Yeah, but he did it on individual indicator at a time, with fixed parameters in changing market conditions.
We all know that this doesn’t work.
Another thing is the method of “Always in” – enter on signal and exit on opposite signal. You can’t expect a single indicator to provide both accurate entry AND accurate exit.
His research is…[Read more]
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – TZ and her friends for manual trading all TF in the forum Trading Systems – Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Done…

gg53 replied to the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
I made an interesting experiment:
I fed a Neural-Network algorithm almost all conceivable known parameters:
Stochastic, RSI, CCI, Bolinger, Pivots, S/R, MA’s, Swap, OHLC, Bid/Ask, Volume, Currency Strength, etc. etc…. to run on each and on combinations of several params.I Let it run on 3 yrs historical data to find and sort most influetial…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
gg53 started the topic Forex Prediction – Science & Logic in the forum Development 11 years, 4 months ago
Let’s say that we got acurate X years of historical data.
We also got all available parameters for currency pairs: OHLC, Bid, Ask, Volume (ticks), Swap, etc.
And we got all kind of indicators (each with std. params), many of those.
How would you test to find out:
which one (or combination of several) will give the most accurate prediction…[Read more]
- Load More