i did something like this but i dont know if it works with the original. ill attach my rough hack

ExtMapBuffer1=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer2=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer3=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,2,i+1…[Read more]

i did something like this but i dont know if it works with the original. ill attach my rough hack

ExtMapBuffer1=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,0,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer2=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+1 )-iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,1,i+2 );

ExtMapBuffer3=iCustom(NULL, TimeFrame, cname,2,i+1…[Read more]

Ok. In this early CIX implementation, it’s not that easy.

First step might be to integrate functions

setAllCurrencyIndexBuffers
setAllRawValueBuffersResetting OR setAllRawValueBuffersContinuous (depends on what you prefer)
setAllSmoothedBuffers

in one single function, which can then be called multiple times to calculate the 1st…[Read more]

I’m trying to evaluate your code, but can’t find an easy way to find a solution (NOT iCustom…).

Can I have a simple (coded) answer, or have to re-read the code?

Thanx,

G.

@gg53:

Long time no see – welcome back!

From earlier discussions I remember that you’re a real fan of iCustom() calls. So this would be the obvious and simple solution to try. I’m sure I don’t have to explain to you how this works.

If iCustom is not preferred this time, you might start looking at function OnCalculate(), lines 389 – 406.…[Read more]

Simplex:

Using CIX_v_2_2_post.mq4:

How can I get previous value of a currency?

I mean something like EUR[2] – EUR[1]?

G.

Using CIX_v_2_2_post.mq4:

How do I get previous value of a currency?

I mean something like EUR[1] – EUR[2]?

G.

@Anti

as for 13 when i try a lower number my MT4 bugs out . also its a good compromise between seeing enough data on my screen and having a lower than 1 min TF to check if price has only hit one within H left

13 tick chart. lots of fun

13 tick chart. lots of fun

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability and point “B” is nowhere near 0.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability abd point “B” is nowhere near 0.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

im going to call bullshit on the near zero percent chance to know a high or low.  point “A” has an “extremely” high probability.

perhaps im not reading what hes saying correctly?

@Anti

there is a 97% chance he doesn’t trade for a living.

@Anti it’s almost as if someone read a forum somewhere and displays the info as it’s his work without citing sources.

there is a 97% chance he doesn’t trade for a living.

the icustom shows mtf without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization so you can ignore the messages above :)

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now (with mtf icustom) without having to use the super high Period RSI n…[Read more]

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization so y…[Read more]

also here is the mod i’m using. i was trying to see if it was more reactive by checking subtracting it with its average. i didnt know how to hook into the code so i made a bunch of ugly redundant code in it lol. its bad i know :P

visually though i think this will work for me now without having to use the super high Period RSI normalization.