smallcat replied to the topic Use R in trading in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Have a wonderful merry Christmas and a happy and successful new year bro Anti ….
Do you mean, we can do statistical analysis just using MQL + R , without other programming language or tools (python or panda as example) ? This is nice … Have a nice holidays too …smallcat replied to the topic Use R in trading in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks a lot @anti for your step by step tutorial .
I have downloaded the R + Rstudio and installed it long time ago, but i was too busy with ideas of great traders @FF about the exit point (levels) and some other good stuffs (including Eurusdd, GG, and some other great ones), so have no enough time to play with this. I have downloaded the MT4 R…[Read more]
smallcat replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks a lot brother, will test it soon

This is a great idea Anti … will follow your posts there at other thread …

MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Please feel free to contact me if you need further explanation, and also inform us your result so we could learn from your experience..best regards
MTH
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Yes Brother, we could use any tools in any charts
this example on how I calculate the r,s,u, periods setting

Hope it help and best regards
MTH
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi Brother, in general I learn about tick volume since the beginning of malcomb vsa thread at ff, so this need several years to learn and practice in forward test mode..lol.
And I never trust backtest especially with MT4 strategy tester, so when I learn about how to handle Tick Volume and use it as one of your trading tool, I use it in forward…[Read more]
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi Brother, I don’t have anymore the original from mladen since it’s already years ago..
Mladen TVI version is line version and I already share the mq4 for our brother smallcat here ;
http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/q-a-for-mq4-coding-newbies/page/2/#post-10440
Hope it help and best regards
MTH
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi Brother, I don’t have anymore the original from mladen since it’s already years ago..
Mladen TVI version is line version and I already share the mq4 for our brother smallcat here ;
http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/q-a-for-mq4-coding-newbies/page/2/#post-10278
Hope it help and best regards
MTH
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi Brother, I don’t have anymore the original from mladen since it’s already years ago..
Mladen TVI version is line version and I already share the mq4 for our brother smallcat here ;
http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/q-a-for-mq4-coding-newbies/page/2/#post-10278
Hope it help and best regards
MTH
MTH2014 replied to the topic MTH – MTF Histo Tick Volume Indicator in the forum Indicator discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi Brother, I don’t have anymore the original from mladen since it’s already years ago..
Mladen TVI version is line version and I already share the mq4 for our brother smallcat here ;
http://penguintraders.com/forums/topic/q-a-for-mq4-coding-newbies/page/2/#post-10440
Hope it help and best regards
MTH
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
regarding the pre-trading conditions: FFCal -> @Emonts contacted me by PM and sent me a mqh file for this with example on how to call the functions. Now he’s fixing it so it works with prefix/postfix pairs. So this one is covered. Max. Spread -> I’ll implement this one Trading Hours, TradeOnMonday, TradeOnFriday, FridayClose -> @slicken had imp…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
regarding the pre-trading conditions: FFCal -> @Emonts contacted me by PM and sent me a mqh file for this with example on how to call the functions. Now he’s fixing it so it works with prefix/postfix pairs. So this one is covered. Max. Spread -> I’ll implement this one Trading Hours, TradeOnMonday, TradeOnFriday, FridayClose -> @slicken had imp…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Wish you merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year!!
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
This is our MAIN indie, so it deserve its place here, untill concluded and we can agree on stable indicator.
In the meantime, someone can finalize the other pre-trading conditions functions (FFCAL, Hours, Spread, etc…).
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
This is our MAIN indie, so it deserve its place here, untill concluded and we can agree on stable indicator.
In the meantime, someone can finalize the other pre-trading conditions functions (FFCA, Hours, Spread, etc…).
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Oooops…
Just saw that simplex beat me in the M1 testing issue…
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
What about testing the EA in rorward test (demo account), with iCustom call on M1 for an hour or so?
This should give an answer to the “repainting” issue AFTER bar close.
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Yes, the initial requirement was TWO functions, one for PEAK and one for TROUGH. Hence the requirement for returning Peak()==1 and Trough()==1.
Now we are using (I hope…) just one function for both Peak&Trough, so the differentiation is redundant, and we can use 1, -1, 0 (or 3-bit logic…).
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Yes, the initial requirement was TWO functions, one for PEAK and one for TROUGH. Hence the requirement for returning Peak()==1 and Trough()==1.
Now we are using (I hope…) just one function for both Peak&Trough, so the differentiation is redundant, and we can use 1, -1, 0.
G.
- Load More
