Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
I had nothing to do with G’s banning. I don’t see how any of my PM correspondence with him would’ve lead to that, unless they were the last straw. I’m very surprised that the members I knew of were banned, except for eitan1010.
It is true, you do not HAVE to prove anything. But since you refuse to do so the question is, why won’t you provide definitive proof in an impartial as possible way? If the algo’s live performance matches your charts it would be very easy for you to prove it. You do not have to show profit on myfxbook, just show when and at what prices the signals occur. You can put it on private for two days, then change it to public when done. M5, one currency pair, approximately 50 consecutive trades (up, down, up, down). Global Prime was created with the intent to be a completely trustworthy broker, so it would be good to open a demo account with them and connect it to myfxbook.
If you choose not to do so, simply say ‘No’. It would just look very suspicious (except to the true believers who, for some silly reason, don’t require proof).
I see that your invite to Skype with you has had the effect of getting others (one so far) to post in your defense. But it’s only you who can present the proof for your algo.
Every swing point, or close to it, is in the charts you post. Are you saying that the predictions suddenly stop while the indicator is on, or that the predictions aren’t as accurate as your charts suggest?
I have only presented the facts as I see them, and asked you to publicly present adequate proof to back up your charts so everyone knows they haven’t been deceived all along.
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
Walton.
Are you saying that what he showed you matches his posted charts, and that an ‘always in’ EA would be very very profitable?
What he showed you in just one hour cannot constitute proof that the algo can predict virtually every swing point. Impressive maybe, but not virtually every swing point. I still don’t think the algo is anywhere near THAT effective, since he’s so resistant to uploading to myfxbook and says he doesn’t have an ‘always in’ EA. And in that short amount of time, it could have been another algo that you saw at work.
All our communications will only take place in an open forum. Please stop avoiding posting to myfxbook with a Skype invite. No one anyone posts here can definitively prove your algo. Only you can do that.
It is correct that you don’t have to prove anything. However please prove that you haven’t been fooling everyone by posting to myfxbook
Pictures speak a thousand words as they say. You didn’t actually have to say you found the HG. Are you now saying it is nowhere as good as your charts suggest?
Since the beginning you have been playing the ‘it’s perpetually in development so I don’t have to do anything’ game. E.g. It’s not finished so you said you won’t post the indicator. Your monster EA wasn’t finished so that was the reason for the massive DDs, and now you say you’re working on an EA so you can’t prove the algo on myfxbook.
‘You also ASSUME that I will (or did) develop an EA according to your trading style. Sorry about that, but Unbelievably – I think differently’.
Going off of the charts you posted to FF, LOADS of people assumed you’d have created an ‘always in’ (a term you coined) EA.
‘You also ASSUME that I’m not allowed to deviate from M5/M15 and go to higher TF’s’.
You don’t need to go higher.
‘You also ASSUME that I MUST post 50 consecutive charts…’
Wrong. I ASKED you to post 50 trades using the M5 from one currency pair on myfxbook. This would be sufficient proof for your algo. Hopefully you don’t have a broker friend who’s willing to add/delete trades in your trade history.
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
Walton.
I do not see how ‘always in’ is stupid. Anyone can see it would be profitable if the algo actually works.
gg53 wrote:
‘If you look at past results (actual real time charts) of the predictions – you will notice profitable results even with poor money management…’
‘The most profitable (pips wise) is the M15’Given ok volatility I would say the m5 would be very profitable as well.
Again, only you can prove your algo’s performance. Nothing I post can prove the algo to anyone.
Again, myfxbook waits for you. I cannot provide proof to everyone, only you can do that.
‘I repeat: ForexGT_Arrow is an indicator, not an EA.’
Everyone knows that. It would be almost unbelievable if you don’t have an ‘always in’ EA that uses the forexgt arrow indicator (assuming it is real).‘I’m using it to build a trading system – and not for 5 or 15 Min. TF’
Anyone can see by your FF charts that the forexgt arrow on the m15 would be profitable. Please feel free to post trades to myfxbook using m15 predictionsWill you take the challenge, or post another evasive post?
Your predictions at FF can be considered cherrypicked so cannot be taken as proof of your algo’s performance, which is meant to accurately predict virtually every swing point.
Surely you must have an ‘always in’ EA by now that utilises the forexgt arrow. If I were a programmer, that would have been one of the very first EAs I would have made. You did however post that you had time to create a ‘monster’ EA utilising renko, forexGT arrow, and your currency strength indicator… But no always in EA for the forexgt arrow???
I’m sure most people would like you to post a myfxbook history so you can prove the algorithm to everyone (please do not put any feature on private). That is the point of posting ‘a sequence of current charts with the ForexGT_Arrow, in several TF’s and several currecy pairs’, no? You could even keep the account private for 2 days (m5 TF), then make it public. Then it’s not a free signal service.
Why do I even bother with this? Because people have put hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours into developing the algo. You keep posting about it. If the forexgt arrow isn’t the real thing, then you’ve been fooling everyone for a long time. They have a right to at least ask for proof.
Myfxbook is waiting…
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
Walton.
Stinky here
For the record, I DID NOT offer money to G for a review of my code. He simply agreed to the review, I sent him the code, and he didn’t do it. I have our PM exchanges in my email. I suppose he was betting that they are long gone.
I don’t actually care whether there is a signal service. I was just pointing out that there’s no sign of forexgt arrow predictions anywhere.
I think there’s a reason G won’t post consecutive trades from one currency pair and TF on myfxbook. It’s because he can’t. However, I have recently been told by someone who’s not a buddy of G that he (the someone who told me) can get clusters of turning point predictions, BUT these clusters are separated by huge gaps. I’m figuring that G gets something similar, and is the reason why he wants to post predictions from multiple TFs and pairs rather than a large string of consecutive predictions from just one TF and one pair
Do you mind making it 50 predictions in a row on the 5min, any currency pair, uploaded onto myfxbook? That would just be like 2 days worth?
Yeah it’s really great when a great pleasure to be the direct forecast and forecast for all 20 pairs at once the new week. G Please, please get this thing times.
Predictions for 20 pairs is asking a bit much I think :). Although it would be easy enough using myfxbook.
Hi G, will you please post 20 live predictions in a row for the eurusd?
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
- AuthorPosts