After some tests/trials:

I prefer Buy-Limit @Close +xx, instead of the current Buy-Stop @High+xx.

In cases where entry is in mid-bar, entry should be also a Buy-Limit instead of Buy-Stop.

Vice versa for Shorts.

Advantage: More pips.

G.

After some tests/trials:

I prefer Buy-Limit @Close +xx, instead of Buy-Stop @High+xx.

In cases where entry is in mid-bar, entry should be also a Buy-Limit instead of Buy-Stop.

Vice versa for Shorts.

Advantage: More pips.

G.

This CS discussion looks interesting, but I want to see a working indicator to compare it’s accuracy and lagging, instead of reviewing bits of code.

This should be done in any case, because we have several CS’s to choose from, and we need to be practical and focus on this specific EA.

We should be using it inside the EA as a function, returning…[Read more]

This CS discussion looks interesting, but I want to see a working indicator to compare it’s accuracy and lagging, instead of reviewing bits of code.

This should be done in any case, because we have several CS’s to choose from, and we need to be practical and focus on this specific EA.

G.

Thanx for contributing.
Please note that @vlanfx is in charge and responsible for versioning.
Any addition/contribution please post as separate file and @vlanfx decide where to integrate it.
BTW: your “Comment” overwites already existing one. That’s one of the reasons why only one person is in charge of new versions, and it’s @vlanfx.
G. [/quote…[Read more]

Thanx for contributing.
Please note that @vlanfx is in charge and responsible for versioning.
Any addition/contribution please post as separate file and @vlanfx decide where to integrate it.
BTW: your “Comment” overwites already existing one. That’s one of the reasons why only one person is in charge of new versions, and it’s @vlanfx.

G.
 

Please post sample “include” for @vlanfx to interface that lib.

G.

Contribute here,  Uradon Keeryder.

If We wanted somewhere private, we all know several other places.

This is a Community project, so everyone can participate & contribute, and you are more then welcome.

VlanFx is responsible for versioning, after comments and discussions of each contribution.

G.

Contribute here,  Uradon Keeryder.

If We wanted somewhere private, we all know several other places.

This is a Community project, so everyone can participate & contribute, and you are more then welcome.

G.

Contribute here,  Uradon Keeryder.

I we wanted somewhere private, we all know several other places.

This is a Community project, so everyone can participate & contribute, and you are more then welcome.

G.

Guys,

(off topic)

I’m worried about Saver0.

We haven’t “seen” him for a long time, and he doesn’t respond to Skype msgs.

I sure hope everything is Ok with him, and he’s just busy.

Does anyone have contacted him lately or know other ways to confirm that everything is Ok with him?

G.

Guys,

I’m worried about Saver0.

We haven’t “seen” him for a long time, and he doesn’t respond to Skype msgs.

I sure hope everything is Ok with him, and he’s just busy.

Does anyone have contacted him lately or know other ways to confirm that everything is Ok with him?

G.

Attached is the initial EA template with some functions example.

VlanFx, Add the current logic based on this, and we’ll call it _v0.1

G.

Attached is the initial EA template with some functions example.

Add the current logic based on this, and we’ll call it _v0.1

G.

Thanks to all comments and remarks.

1. The EA currently (as is) is just a rough skeleton, and is CURRENTLY profitable on almost all pairs (with same params) on H4.

2. ALL contributions are more then welcome.

3. In order to check contribution (or addition/suggestion) validity, it must ADD value to current version, whether increase PROFIT, reduce…[Read more]

Thanks to all comments and remarks.

1. The EA currently (as is) is just a rough skeleton, and is CURRENTLY profitable on almost all pairs (with same params) on H4.

2. ALL contributions are more then welcome.

3. In order to check contribution (or addition/suggestion) validity, it must ADD value to current version, whether increase PROFIT, reduce…[Read more]

Remember that our base line is the posted EURUSD H4 results posted before. Other pairs perform roughly the same with same params, no optimizations.

I’ll be more than glad, but more important is that I’m sure the EA will be happy !!

G.

Remember that our base line is the posted EURUSD H4 results posted before. Other pairs perform roughly the same with same params, no optimizations.

I’ll be more than glad, but more important is that I’m sure the EA will be happy !!

G.

G.

I volunteer to do it. I’m not at this forum everyday though, so my reactions may take some time. But if it’s not a problem then I would like to be considered [/quote]

Not a problem at all. I’m not expecting full time workers.

As a matter of fact, I’m glad that you are the driver of this wagon….

Later on I’ll provide the EA dummy ske…[Read more]

No need to concentrate on that.

Trend is just a filter for this strategy, and as you can see it’s already working and profitable.

It should be just another function, and a replaceable one.

Current results are going to be our base-line, which should improve by at least one aspect with each addition/modifiction. Whether it’s win/loss ratio,…[Read more]