Allright: I’ve had the idea to post a link back to the origin. So here you go:

http://www.stevehopwoodforex.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=105044#p105044

@muuh: maybe you could edit your first post of this thread and provide this link also?

Well – I believe that if HGI is being discussed on different forums around the world, with links back to its origin at SHF provided, then this will also serve as a promotion for Steve’s great site.

When I was a student, our professors didn’t prohibit discussion of study topics outside the university.

s.

Yes: and Nanningbob usually trades huge SL. He’s very patient, accumulating small profits over years. He certainly is successful!

Count me in!

Playing the Judge: The Who, What, and Why Behind the Best Known Toy Awards

This seems to be the first candidate, founded an hor ago.

simplex

Sure!

Last summer I had the opportunity to visit their concert in Hamburg / Germany during their World Tour 2014. Absolutely great live act, they have so many lead singers (both male and female) it would be enough for at least 4 bands.

And they do not only generate income for their own living, they’re running several music schools around the world…[Read more]

Ahhh – the MQ standard. So what exactly do you want to modify? If you think it might be off topic here just send me a PM.

@Bartleby: I can provide some coding skills. Like to give it a try?

@drloyd, just imagine I had the idea to create a chart with an M57 timeframe. It wouldn’t be very handy to work with, but basically it would work, and CLOSE levels obviously were at different prices compared to H1. The timeframes we’re used to work with are the result of arbitrary conventions.

Ahhh – the track that got Playing For Change started years ago.

Great post, Bartleby! Did you know PFC before or did my previous posts infect you?

That’s surely true for nearly all bars on a chart. IMO, the only exception is current bar. If you’re working on H1 and it’s 3:30 pm then current price will usually be closer to Close[0] than on Open[0].

I think you should take the particular choice of h in both timeframes into account. Without knowing h in both timeframes I would not dare to define any rule about the relationship of TZ in those timeframes.

Wow – thanks a lot. This is really helpful.

Happy New Year Pip. Nice to see you again, and may you have success in 2015 …

You named this thread Autocorrelation.

At first I tried to get an idea of the topic by reading wikipedia (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation ) I’m having trouble to see the connection between the thread title and the content of your 1st post.

Can you provide some hints about that? I’m a bit baffled at the moment.