On this one I changed 0 code aside from commenting out the include and I just moved the functions that call icus from mqh to the EA

im wondering if it tests differently than the mqh version for anyone else.

On this one I changed 0 code aside from commenting out the include and I just moved the functions from mqh to the EA

im wondering if it tests differently than the mqh version for anyone else.

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom directly and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom to the 1.2 and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom to the 1,2 and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not backtesting right for me.

i patched in icustom and it looks about the same as the inital version.

@smallcat  yes. on dropping sx_ClearMethod on the history tester with the “visual” option and running forward the bars are not colored correctly but the history is perfect when you first drop the indicator on the visual mode.

in real-time (not history tester) it runs perfect so far.

could be a problem on my end though

@simplex

nice.  historic looks really good. when i run it forward in the history tester your indy gets some anomalies but i don’t know if that is on my end. going to let it run forward on a chart

@simplex

nice.  historic looks really good. when i run it forward in the history tester i get some anomalies but i don’t know if that is on my end. going to let it run forward on a chart

Hi Brother, forgive me for my noob idea..

1. You could use MA for this averaging , and you could use
double MathAbs(
double value // numeric value
);

to make all the calculation in positive value.
for example ;

//for your 1st question
AverageRange{i} = MathAbs ( iMA(Symbol(),NULL,InpAveragePeriod,0,0,PRICE_CLOSE,i)
-…[Read more]

Hi Brother, forgive me for my noob idea..

1. You could use MA for this averaging , and you could use
double MathAbs(
double value // numeric value
);

to make all the calculation in positive value.
for example ;

//for your 1st question
AverageRange = MathAbs ( iMA(Symbol(),NULL,InpAveragePeriod,0,0,PRICE_CLOSE,i)
-…[Read more]

Hi Brother, forgive me for my noob idea..

1. You could use MA for this averaging , and you could use
double MathAbs(
double value // numeric value
);

to make all the calculation in positive value.
for example ;

//for your 1st question
AverageRange = MathAbs ( iMA(Symbol(),NULL,InpAveragePeriod,0,0,PRICE_CLOSE,i)
-…[Read more]

Hi Brother, forgive me for my noob idea..

1. You could use MA for this averaging , and you could use
double MathAbs(
double value // numeric value
);

to make all the calculation in positive value.
for example ;

//for your 1st question
AverageRange = MathAbs ( iMA(Symbol(),NULL,InpAveragePeriod,0,0,PRICE_CLOSE,i)
-…[Read more]

it didn´t compile , because of a mistyping (one _ too much) of the mqh file

I changed it, if you don´t mind simplex ;)

I edited my prev post with how i might call the first indy externally.

I just skim the threads so i have no idea if it conforms exactly to what ya need it to do.

perhaps @simplex or someone can verify it and post how they would call it.

I have a lot of fun with the clear method on demo’s but i use it in a different way :)