Hi Brother.. lol, my old brother from more than 5 years ago..

Nice to met you here.. , feel free to contribute and share your knowledge brother..

May Allah Bless You and your family and friends with healthy, wealthy and strong faith..

Have a nice week end

MTH

while my testing , The auto Lot calculation didn´t worked correct. The Lotsize was too big and it couldnt open trades in the strategy tester. I changed a value from 100 to 1000.. highlighted it .. now it works. maybe some help for people with the same issue.

// Auto Lot Calculation

double CalcLot(int StopLoss)

{

StopLoss = StopLoss /…[Read more]

Hi Guys.. BE CAREFUL.. Market start to ‘dance’,   it’s Luring time… lol.. 

MTH

Thanks G & simplex. So if we have some buffers (arrays), and we use IndicatorCounted(), is it better to check for New Bar coming, then we shift the content of the array ? We add a new space to array for storing the new result later. In this case, we are only work with last (current) candle, which will safe CPU load … or ? Unfortunately TVI by o…[Read more]

Hi Brother,.. lol of course you are not wrong..   this FOMC day with highly potential that the fed will change their interest rate..  market will move very volatile,  so beware for all of you who use huge leverage account and relative spread,  sometime hard SL or trailing stop also not work, and your MT4 platform freeze..lol. Remember when Swis…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the Start loop pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

one of the options i did with mine was to add (base…[Read more]

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to code a base str spaghetti

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

anyways the adjustable reset is cool to play with. its always fun to make a base hybrid

not the command itself but the way it ran.  return 0 must have broke prev_calculated. that’s why it kept running the print statement over and over until the OnInit pooped

the setAllRaw functions are eating up big chunks.

all the loops seem odd. i would have to rewrite it to how im use to seeing it.

prev_calculated == 0 still seems strange. it runs every tick for 46 ticks and quits but the prev_calculated is still 0 when it quits wtf.

@simplex

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have enough history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have enough history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have the history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;