quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

quick test

original is peaktroughEA

1.2 is 1.2 with .mqh that calls icustom

1.2 test is with an ugly hack calling the same icustom directly in the EA

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom directly and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom to the 1.2 and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not back-testing right for me.

i patched in icustom to the 1,2 and it looks about the same as the initial version.

1.2 is still using the .mqh which is why its not backtesting right for me.

i patched in icustom and it looks about the same as the inital version.

@smallcat  yes. on dropping sx_ClearMethod on the history tester with the “visual” option and running forward the bars are not colored correctly but the history is perfect when you first drop the indicator on the visual mode.

in real-time (not history tester) it runs perfect so far.

could be a problem on my end though

@simplex

nice.  historic looks really good. when i run it forward in the history tester your indy gets some anomalies but i don’t know if that is on my end. going to let it run forward on a chart

@simplex

nice.  historic looks really good. when i run it forward in the history tester i get some anomalies but i don’t know if that is on my end. going to let it run forward on a chart

I edited my prev post with how i might call the first indy externally.

I just skim the threads so i have no idea if it conforms exactly to what ya need it to do.

perhaps @simplex or someone can verify it and post how they would call it.

I have a lot of fun with the clear method on demo’s but i use it in a different way :)

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

For “ClearMethod.mq4” perhaps you could do


bool isUpSwing,isUpSwing2;
double upSwingLine;
double downSwingLine;

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, 1) > 0); // 1 co…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

Perhaps


bool isUpSwing,isUpSwing2;
double upSwingLine;
double downSwingLine;

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, 1) > 0); // 1 confirms last bar. use 0 for re…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]

if im not mistaken i posted this earlier.

I made a multi time-frame version out of the CMHx but i don’t think it would be applicable to what you guys are doing.

the guy who wrote the first one calls it like

isUpSwing = (iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 0, i) > 0);
if (isUpSwing) {
upSwingLine = iCustom(NULL, 0, "ClearMethod", 1, i)…[Read more]