the setAllRaw functions are eating up big chunks.

all the loops seem odd. i would have to rewrite it to how im use to seeing it.

prev_calculated == 0 still seems strange. it runs every tick for 46 ticks and quits but the prev_calculated is still 0 when it quits wtf.

@simplex

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have enough history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have enough history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have the history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

and  shift = limit-1 should fix array?

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop. also i like to do this in case they dont have the history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

and  shift = limit-1 should fix array?

oh maxbars isnt used in the loop also i like to do this in case they dont have the history for the maxbars set

if (maxBars>limit-1)maxBars=limit-1;

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

and  shift = limit-1 should fix array?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

and  shift = limit-1 for array?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

main loop should be number of buffers not limit?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

or is that meant to run every tick

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

if (prev_calculated == 0)  ?

not necessarily as a replacement but something for the non coders to play with until it gets patched up

@simplex

RE: but nobody will improve his coding or even learn the basics of coding by just downloading and compiling.

I have learned what i know from downloading and compiling. if it downloads and compiles then i have an example of something…[Read more]

not necessarily as a replacement but something for the non coders to play with until it gets patched up

also sometimes you learn by seeing examples

not necessarily as a replacement but something for the non coders to play with until it gets patched up

re: refresh

or you could download one of the clear method indicator’s floating around the net as it’s almost identical

not necessarily as a replacement but something for the non coders to play with until it gets patched up

https://www.mql5.com/en/code/10623

re: refresh

or you could download one of the clear method indicator’s floating around the net as it’s almost identical

not necessarily as a replacement but something to play with until it gets patched up

https://www.mql5.com/en/code/10623