Hello Grey Wolf! Welcome to the community!!  

6th bar is valid too. I just marked bars for illustration of the concept, not all possible trades.

G.

To enter such a trade you need: potential Profit-Costs>0.

G.

I didn’t say Median or HL/2 – there is at least one better way (pips wise).

But HL/2 will do the work of demonstration.

In the attached chart – “close” and “sentiment” are in opposite directions on the same bar – so NEXT bars will meet the current bar “SENTIMENT” price.

G.

I didn’t say Median or HL/2 – there is at least one better way (pips wise).

But HL/2 will do the work of demonstration.

In the attached chart – “close” and “sentiment” are in opposite directions – so NEXT bars will meet the current bar “SENTIMENT” price.

G.

Search for bars where the ma’s CLOSE is in opposite direction.

G.

Hello juga.. Kabar gitu deh.. hehehe.

pm ane link yg ada chart ‘non renko’ nya bro, kan susah ane kalau nyari-nyari seabreg gitu.. thanks.

MTH

Hi Brother, try not use SSA CycDiv with renko first,  delete your renko chart and also your renko builder indicator from M1.  then use standard plain candlestick chart and upload SSA CycDiv Indicator only, and please inform me what happen..

Best Regards

MTH

Try ma (1) and find Diff direction on same bar.

Grasp the concept, and continue from there.

G.

Try ma (1) and find Diff direction on same bar.

G.

Thanks for the insult.
G.

A link-back and not sharing here original code from SteveHopwood is a good and acceptable idea.

References to original code should be in a form of links to origin.

G.

I just started using it heavily in terms of determining the trend. The long term trend lines (slowest and slow) don’t change often and they tell us what the long term trend is. Then the short term trend lines (fast and fastest) tells me of the current movement. I’m looking for entries when the short term trend goes against the long term trend and…[Read more]

FXEZ,

Yes, HL/2 is a good enough answer, when there is a direction contradiction whithin the same bar. although there is (at least) one slightly better way (pips wise).

My way of exploiting it is by multi-lot trading, considering spread & slipage.

Writing an EA for this is just a couple of code lines.

G.

FXEZ,

Yes, HL/2 is a good enough answer, when there is a direction contradiction whithin the same bar. although there is (at least) a slightly better way (pips wise).

My way of exploiting it is by multi-lot trading, considering spread & slipage.

Writing an EA for this is just a couple of code lines.

G.

FXEZ,

Yes, HL/2 is a good enough answer, when there is a direction contradiction whithin the same bar. although there is (at least) another way.

My way of exploiting it is by multi-lot trading, considering spread & slipage.

Writing an EA for this is just a couple of code lines.

G.

Very small DD, since it’s almost immediate, and no need for statistics.

No connection to “delicate secret” which you can uncover reading some books on fractals.

Later I’ll post a chart marked with bars that contain “contradiction” in them.

G.