It’s called martingaling (double down) and it is only an option. You need a large account to survive this approach.

Nowhere is doubling required that is optional as well as adjustable.

leave the indicator alone and use the EA instead for testing.

Stick with the single trade approach before jumping on the martingale train

each pairs has its own…[Read more]

You have the perfect name

SUCKER!

KEEP FOOLING YOURSELF AND YOUR PROGRESS WILL BE NAUGHT!!!

THE BLUEPRINT WAS ALREADY LAID…

main reason this is a problem for people- GREED

YOU ARE UNDERFUNDED AND TRYING TO FORCE CONSOLIDATIONS TO APPEAR. Study at the 15K minimum level!

YOU WANT MORE THAN 2 WEEKLY TRADES SO YOU FORCE MORE AND BEGIN TRADING OTHER THAN CZs

With all do respect Dave, there are plenty of threads on FF that questions like yours have been addressed. This is more of a continuation. Treat the SSBO thread on FF like google and go searching for your answers there. You are really disrespecting FXH and all the work/years put into sharing to the public.

First things first- many of you are…[Read more]

Ok, back to Eurusdds formalization of the similarity principle:

As far as I understand it, we need a function g(a) which maps every unique prize level ´a´ (e.g. close prize) to another value b.  To speak of λ-isomorphic sets A (a ∈ A) and B (b ∈ B), it must be possible to conclude from a particular a to a particular b and vice versa (bidire…[Read more]

Ok, back to Eurusdds formalization of the similarity principle:

As far as I understand it, we need a function g(a) which maps every unique prize level a (e.g. close prize) to another value b.  To speak of λ-isomorphic sets A (a ∈ A) and B (b ∈ B), it must be possible to conclude from a particular a to a particular b and vice versa (bidi…[Read more]

Ok, back to Eurusdds formalization of the similarity principle:

As far as I understand it, we need a function ‘g(a)’ which maps every unique prize level ‘a’ (e.g. close prize) to another value ‘b’.  To speak of λ-isomorphic sets ‘A’ (‘a ∈ A’) and ‘B’ (‘b ∈ B’), it must be possible to conclude from a particular ‘a’ to a particular ‘b’ and vice…[Read more]

DAVE

GO BACK AND READ THE ORIGINAL THREAD ON FF…

I did find a commercial site with some on (obviously silly money)

You named it: like most commercial offers in FX, silly money.

I am looking at building some new currency strength indicators one based on pip movement with a start from 0 function (market open Monday) and one based on ATR. Has anyone come across any, thoughts ??

Thoughts:

Pips…[Read more]

… and here is the similarity thread as one pdf file (3791 pages, 141 MB!): download

I have no idea why MT4 standard MA would not work set to period = 1. On my platform, it just shows the raw price according to your choice, without any smoothing. That’s how it should be.

If not: have you tried reinstalling MT4? (Sorry if this has been suggested before, I don’t follow the whole thread).

If there’s an issue with the installation…[Read more]

I have no idea why MT4 standard MA would not work set to period = 1. On my platform, it just shows the raw price according to your choice, without any smoothing. That’s how it should be.

If not: have you tried reinstalling MT4? (Sorry if this has been suggested before, I don’t follow the whole thread).

If there’s an issue with the installation…[Read more]

@Roni26:

Surprise surprise the ‘bitch’ comes out in you again.

@forexhard:

You are a poser, a pretender, a troll and a time waster.

I kindly ask both of you to get back to a more appropriate diction. Personal accuses like these remind me of some of the worst threads I know from FF. It would suit this community far better if you could control you…[Read more]

@pipatronic: nice vid, thanks for it!

Contentwise, though, there’s nothing really new as compared to our recent written discussion. My opinion stated here is still valid.

If hedging helps you in your trading approach, just go ahead. But when developing an EA I do not see a reason to go that way, because a quick exit and re-entry is easier to…[Read more]

Hmm – I understood “diversification” like entries in different pairs …

Yes, I used the term diversification a bit loosely, and I said ‘kind of diversification’ to emphasize this.

Please take it like this: since you don’t know where exactly the ‘ideal’ entry point with the smallest drawdown would be, you ‘diversify’ your entries by griddin…[Read more]

Hmm – I understood “diversification” like entries in different pairs …

Understandable …

Hmm – I understood “diversification” like entries in different pairs …

Understandable …

I do not know in detail how @MTH2014 sets up his grids. But in general this fits perfectly the arguments PipMeUp @ FF lays out in the last chapter of his paper, as stated above. It’s some kind of diversification of your entries trying to even out potential drawdowns caused by short term volatility.

When entering a trade, you do not know in…[Read more]

I do not know in detail how @MTH2014 sets up his grids. But in general this fits perfectly the arguments PipMeUp @ FF lays out in the last chapter of his paper, as stated above. It’s some kind of diversification of your entries trying to even out potential drawdowns caused by short term volatility.

When entering a trade, you do not know in…[Read more]

At Binary Options Edge our friend @MTH2014 wrote:

Would be intereting to calculate if this is true. As this is not a question of money management but of good entries (binary options usually have a pre-determined ending time), I’m not sure how to calculate it … Any ideas, pros or cons?