@smallcat. That’s true. But I haven’t adjusted the settings. If I set the length for 1440 on M1 I’d roughly estimate that prize bounces two to three times back to 0/100 level. But my initial idea was not to use it in a similarity setup – I’d just want to share it with others that may find it interesting as now it shouldn’t give false signals in…[Read more]

@smallcat. That’s true. But I haven’t adjusted the settings. If I set the length for 1440 on M1 I’d roughly estimate that prize bounces two to three times back to 0/100 level. But my initial idea was not to use it in a similarity setup – I’d just want to share it with others that may find it interesting as now it shouldn’t give false signals in…[Read more]

@smallcat. That’s true. But I haven’t adjusted the settings. If I set the length for 1440 on M1 I’d roughly estimate that prize bounces two to three times back to 0/100 level. But my initial idea was not to use it in a similarity setup – I’d just want to share it with others that may find it interesting as now it shouldn’t give false signals in…[Read more]

@smallcat. That’s true. But I haven’t adjusted the settings. If I set the length for 1440 on M1 I’d roughly estimate that prize bounces two to three times back to 0/100 level. But my initial idea was not to use it in a similarity setup – I’d just want to share it with others that may find it interesting as now it shouldn’t give false signals in…[Read more]

Yes, @smallcat – you are right. Especially the preceding red candle in conjunction with the big bullish one of patter 1 shows me that there could be also a bullish breakout soon for two reasons:

Both form a bullish engulfing.
The long bullish candle of pattern 1 shows me that bulls have strengthened. Its body engulfs the previous two bodies and…[Read more]

Hi Simplex,

Thanks a lot for this post and post #11279, very good and clear explanation … Easy to understand the reason 

And the code formatting works well, including the indent.

Thank you very much Simplex … 

Hi Simplex,

Thanks a lot for this post and post #11279, very good and clear explanation … Easy to understand the reason 

And the code formatting works well, including the indent.

Thank you very much Simplex … 

@smallcat and everybody else interested:

Maybe try to change your view on our community project for a short while: consider we’re not only coding one EA, but a collection of flexible and exchangeable trading software modules instead. The overall goal of these modules should be to facilitate coding an EA, and the EAs which are the result of our…[Read more]

@smallcat

At the moment only in my brain or on my hard disk. I will post my version later this morning. Stay tuned, please!

s.

Thanks simplex, will look at it … 

@smallcat:

It’s not a trick, it’s just a bit of coding work using the OnTimer() event handler. If you’re interested, refer to my experimental indicator posted here. That one does not paint candles of timeframes below one minute, but it visualizes tick data in a different way. Compiling that data to candles and displaying them would be a simple step.

s.

I’ll respond and relate to that AFTER the basic EA skeleton in “Tradind made REALLY simple” will be finished.

G.

Thank you, @smallcat:

This is not what I meant – I coded the ALMA in mq4 a long time ago. What I meant is whether anybody has tried to apply an FIR filter like ALMA to the VZO algorithm instead of the EMA (IIR).

s.

@smallcat:

This is not really true. You can calculate values for lower timeframes than shown on chart without any problem. You just can’t visualize those numbers in the way we are used to when looking at MT4 indicators.

Most simple case: the same timeframe on chart and on indicator (red volume histogram on my pic). We’re used to display a…[Read more]

@smallcat: Unfortunately at the moment I have tons of other things to do. But I will attach it here when I’ve finished this exercise.

@smallcat:

Ask @Anti – this is his baby!

s.

M

Thank you very much, @MTH2014 (Kiads), @smallcat, and @simplex! Will try it next night …

M

Thank you very much, @MTH2014 (Kiads), @Smallcat, and @simplex! Will try it next night …

Logic follows guidelines as in post ##9553.

There is no “5” variable there…

Attached pls find how it should look like on EURJPY, H4.

For the EA purpose an Histogram is also Ok.

The ForexGT_VolumeOsc is an added feature to Pin-point exact bar entry, but for the current version it’s not required since we enter on Peak/Trough area…[Read more]

Logic follows guidelines as in post ##9553.

There is no “5” variable there…

Attached pls find how it should look like on EURJPY, H4.

G.

https://www.mql5.com/en/charts/4378801/eurjpy-x-h4-atom8-financial-services