simplex replied to the topic Potential SPAM and SCAM Alerts in the forum Site Related 8 years, 11 months ago
New member ‘blessing maxwell’ sent me the following message. I’ll report that member to have his/her account deleted.
I do not assume that anybody around replied to this ‘generous offer’ …
… unless you’re James Veach, see here B-)…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
@flx23: Well, so I believe that we all don’t see any edge.
However. Another thing that rankles me is how semi-professional traders trades before computers and fast datafeeds arose. I mean, how did successful traders which didn’t work at the stock exchange or a bank directly decided when to trade and/or when to get out of a trade. So, when did…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
@Bartleby: Thanks for participating! Well, especially the mathematical edge got my attention. But I’ve also never found something promising.
simplex replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
Ok, when looking at tick data, we do not look at any timeframe, just incoming prices. OHLC, or candlesticks, can only be constructed when we start to structure tick data according to rules we define. Most obvious rule is simple timing, i.e. a uniform timeframe.
Most traders choose one or more timeframes for their trading that are somehow…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Price on CLOSE ?! Really?!?! in the forum Development 9 years ago
Just read about the old stuff and I found a logical problem: Prize can deviate from its value. Wouldn’t it mean that the true value can be far above/below a candle? And what if we see another contradiction of both measures (OHLC4 and C) in such a region where prize already is way off its true value. These cases may lead to big DD.
In other words…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
If the condition is that both charts should represent the same TF then your explanation seems to be most obvious. But what if not? For instance, non-MT4 platforms usually support tick charts as well. Tickers from the stock exchange don’t show candles at all (although I don’t really know what all the numbers represent …):Is there any…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
If the condition is that both charts should represent the same TF then your explanation seems to be most obvious. But what if not? For instance, non-MT4 platforms usually support tick charts as well. Tickers from the stock exchange don’t show candles at all (although I don’t really know what all the numbers represent …):Is there any…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
If the condition is that both charts should represent the same TF then your explanation seems to be the most obvious. But what if not? For instance, non-MT4 platforms usually support tick charts as well. Is there any advantage in using candlesticks then in comparison to tick charts alone?simplex replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
First of all, I do not think that there’s such a thing like a ‘stupid’ question. If someone does not know a certain fact, or does not understand every detail of somebody else’s statement, or just is a newbie in a certain field, or … (fill in whatever makes sense!), he or she should feel free to post a question hoping the community can help out!…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
… and here is my question …
Before two or three years I’ve read the first time a rhetorical question:
Have you ever wonder, when you have a line graph, why in the hell would you invent the candlestick!!! ?
Clever Japanese people, they never did tell you why they invented it in the first place. Decades had past and then candlestick patterns…Anti replied to the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
… and here is my question …
Before two or three years I’ve read the first time a rhetorical question of CrucialPoint:
Have you ever wonder, when you have a line graph, why in the hell would you invent the candlestick!!! ?
Clever Japanese people, they never did tell you why they invented it in the first place. Decades had past and then…Anti started the topic Thread for (stupid) questions in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
From time to time a read something that gets my absolute attention. Then I think about it over and over again – for days, weeks, moths, and even years – without getting some answers to my questions on that topic. However, in these cases I’d like to discuss about the ideas/theories/topics and hear the opinions of other people.
Thus, this thread is…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic Jim Sloman's Ocean Theory in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 9 years ago
Once again … Like

Lowphat replied to the topic The similarity system – discussion in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
let me clarify the image i posted was just something that looked interesting . i was noticing when all OSC’s get above say 20% with the majority above 50% the potential fractal had way less chance of running a full 6 bars before a true fractal top/bot. my live trading method is more about trading a pullback back past a mid fractal if the long…[Read more]
Anti replied to the topic The similarity system – discussion in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
Ah, ok. Congratulation. But I don’t see how you trade it. Do you use it for trend trading or reversal trading?
Lowphat replied to the topic The similarity system – discussion in the forum General Discussions 9 years ago
was messing around with zz confluence. just for fun using 10 random oscillators/settings and waiting for the majority to gravitate above a percentage line.
each one falls into a mild supply/demand origin for another point of confluence.
simplex replied to the topic Jim Sloman's Ocean Theory in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 9 years ago
Maybe the Natural MA was covered in Video #2 of the seminar series – the missing one.
There are functional MQL prototypes you can analyze in the links I provided above.
I do not understand the term ‘argmax i (NMM)’. Basically, the fast NMA is an NMA that dynamically truncates its own weighted lookback interval, thus acting faster than Standard…[Read more]
simplex replied to the topic Jim Sloman's Ocean Theory in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 9 years ago
Yep, just skip the esoterics! Later on in Ch. 12 some analogies between physical and trading aspects, which I usually look at a bit skeptically, are becoming interesting from a very remote point of view.
What instantly intrigued me was Jim’s imperative attempt to remove as much arbitrariness as possible from any indicator calculation. Ever…[Read more]
simplex replied to the topic Jim Sloman's Ocean Theory in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 9 years ago
Yep, my first impression was very similar, several weeks ago.
Let me cite from Chapter 8, ‘The Zen Moment’:
This is why, in my opinion, it is advantageous to develop at least partially your own approach to markets. The Advanced Ocean Software that is part of the Ocean Master program is designed to give you a set of tools with which to develop…
Anti replied to the topic Jim Sloman's Ocean Theory in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 9 years ago
Well, I read through the paper you linked to and I also watched some of the videos. I don’t really see something promising yet. Have you found some other papers on that topic (info seem to be quite rare).
- Load More