gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
MT4 BackTests relies on actual data (if exist…) of Open, High, Low, Close (OHLC) of each bar.
EVERYTHING that is missing from the above is Randomized, which means all ticks within that data are randomized.
The MAX accuracy that you can get is getting perfect history of M1 OHLC of that test period and TimeFrame. Even that is hard to get.
On…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
MT4 BackTests relies on actual data (if exist…) of Open, High, Low, Close (OHLC) of each bar.
EVERYTHING that is missing from the above is Randomized, which means all ticks within that data is randomized.
The MAX accuracy that you can get is getting perfect history of M1 OHLC of that test period and TimeFrame. Even that is hard to get.
On top…[Read more]
simplex replied to the topic Q & A For MQ4 Coding Newbies in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
This is not really true. You can calculate values for lower timeframes than shown on chart without any problem. You just can’t visualize those numbers in the way we are used to when looking at MT4 indicators.
Most simple case: the same timeframe on chart and on indicator (red volume histogram on my pic). We’re used to display a…[Read more]
smallcat replied to the topic Q & A For MQ4 Coding Newbies in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi Simplex, how can you define the Pre >> Code format, so we can see the bracket in the post ? This is a good idea. Using BlockQuote can not show the brackets of our source code in the post.
Thanks
smallcat replied to the topic Q & A For MQ4 Coding Newbies in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi,
Any body have idea about the logic of creating MTF indicator ? Normally i create a main indicator, and i call it using iCustom (so i need to create 2 indicators in this case). By this way, i can create a MTF indicator set the TF from M1 to MN1 , and i can call the main indicator from other TF (lets say on TF M1, M5, … MN1 chart). The result…[Read more]smallcat replied to the topic Q & A For MQ4 Coding Newbies in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi,
Any body have idea about the logic of creating MTF indicator ? Normally i create a main indicator, and i call it using iCustom (so i need to create 2 indicators in this case). By this way, i can create a MTF indicator set the TF from M1 to MN1 , and i can call the main indicator from other TF (lets say on TF M1, M5, … MN1 chart). The result…[Read more]smallcat replied to the topic Q & A For MQ4 Coding Newbies in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi,
Any body have idea about the logic of creating MTF indicator ? Normally i create a main indicator, and i call it using iCustom (so i need to create 2 indicators in this case). By this way, i can create a MTF indicator set the TF from M1 to MN1 , and i can call the main indicator from other TF (lets say on TF M1, M5, … MN1 chart). The result…[Read more]smallcat replied to the topic Voice Chat in the forum General Discussions 10 years, 7 months ago
Skype for SmallcatFx : smallcat21168
smallcat replied to the topic Voice Chat in the forum General Discussions 10 years, 7 months ago
SmallcatFx : smallcat21168
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
You are right G. Sorry, not tested it before sent my post. Thanks for your indicators

gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
ClearMethodSignals_01 indicator (post #10824) does exactly that.
“x” denotes swing point (repaints while bar active, static after bar close).
Arrow denotes area breakout, same behaviour (repaints while bar active, static after bar close).
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
ClearMethodSignals_01 indicator (post #10824) does exactly that.
“x” denotes swing point (repaints while bar active, static after bar close).
Arrow denotes area breakout.
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
I don’t agree with that statement.
Peak&Trough is our main logic, but pre-trading conditions are also important.
The EA should consider those pre-conditions, and if the user doesn’t want to consider some of those conditions he/she can disable them, but those conditions should be there.
G.
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Thanks a lot G. Wishing you and your family, all penguins and their families, a Merry Christmas and very happy, healthy and succesful new year 2016 …
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
No, you’re not:
Anti wrote:
I’m an idiot.I’ve read so many good posts of yours, I’m sure you’re not!
s. [/quote]Agree with simplex … if Anti can understand R good, and he is and idiot, then what about other people that do not understand R ?

@simplex, can we create Dot or Arrow OBJECTs on Chart Window (not at separate win…[Read more]
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi @jaguar1637, I’m trying to add the FFCal_mini to our EA, but I can’t get it to work. I can try only backtesting as there are no news at this time. I copied the code you posted here but keep getting these values from the indi throughout a day full of news: MinToNews = 999999 MinSinceNews = 0 The following condition then causes the EA to stop tra…[Read more]
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Attached…
G.
gg53 replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Attached…
simplex replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Agree:
The one @Lowphat has posted is giving the same signals as my current WIP version. So as long as we’re using iCustom to test why not take that one?
It should be possible to derive a function for direct EA use from only one of our approaches, no matter which one. The logic of the algorithm demands to keep track of current and previous…[Read more]
- Load More