Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Hi G,
No, this is still using Close[0] of the 5 min.
Unfortunately, I have encountered a programming issue changing this from a static to dynamic – so the picture your seeing is only verifying 10 bars.
It is interesting to note that when you start seeing a confluence of these TZ’s , that a [possible significant] move becomes imminent. Unfortunately I have yet to figure out how to determine the next jump, even with this information.
I’ll get around to posting more charts later tonight…unfortunately I am still a slave at my job…..
As you can see , the frequency of these areas that I have (manually) highlighted in blue is increasing…….
Greetings everyone
I’ve been in and out of the Similarity thread, GG53’s pissing dog thread, and have read a bit of Vlady’s and PiratePip’s threads.
I am not caught up , thus please consider anything I say as ‘next to useless’ ;)
What I don’t necessarily understand about all of this is – how the progression went in the Similarity thread from the Cycle Identifier to DNA sequencing (this is where I my work stopped, as I could not replicate GG53’s results…more on this in a bit), to the TZ’s , to the Sub sequence (which going over the PDF, appears to be the final answer to the DNA sequencing).
That being said….what I ‘think I see’ , is that the TZ’s formed are not necessarily significant in themselves,but rather the FREQUENCY of the TZ’s in a specific area.
I will attempt to post a chart later about this – time is running a bit short for me at the moment.
-Almo
