Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
@gg53 , no relevant trend. Each one make trading in differents timeframes.
But if “x” is a trend and “Ti” the timeframe, and “w” the value of tickVolume, we can define that if we can trade in M15, then x:= w for Ti>T15.
The problem is:
we can define the current trend late?
Hi all and thank you very much @tankhang.
Trend can be find out with tick Volume, right??
Thank you for reply @gg53 and @Anti,
then, only conditions in “x” previous bars about higher and lower values of price.
then the logic would be for down swing:
if highest value of (high) “x” bars is higher than current high value && lowest values of previous (low) “x” bars is higher than current low value then we are in down swing.
It is correct this logic?
Hi all,
I see great post. I was in a tryp but now i am going to read all.
Thank you very much @Anti for thread of R.
I want to ask question to @Anti and @gg53 about green and brown bars because the logic i dont understand very well. When you said:
highest High = Previous Bar HighestHigh…..
is the highest high in the previous “x” bars? because highest high and lowest high in previous bar not possible, correct??
Thank you very much in advance!!
This reply has been reported for inappropriate content.
I susbcribe too.
Thank you very much @Simplex!
Hi @gg53,
when you say “Volume meanungfull average” i undertand that this average is in database. Otherwise, if the average is dynamic, the process will be relative.
It is correct?
i want to understand this well for go to desk!!
Thank you very much
Yes, i agree with you too. For statistical study i want to have too, when i have some time) it looks like that there is to manipule data. Volume is leading, so maybe you have to delay the other variable for correct study of correlation. I think, the study of G is very important and very real. So i have to repeat that the importance is market in range. If G put market in range is because there exist high correlation between variables. Otherwise, the process would be random and with noise (fake movements) .
GG can predict areas of oversold and overbuy so, he can predict the movement during x time. The question is How product this areas of oversold and overbuy with accurate.
On the other hand, i think count ticks about x period of time and this is volume
I think the same.
But i think that the question is not obtain ticks, or count ticks for volume. The question is Market in -X and +X .
By other way, same path that price
Hi all,
I never worked with tick so looks like interesting and i want to learn all possible.
I have some doubts:
1- For predicted direction is necessary 1-2 previous ticks?
2- Volume of tick is the direction of this tick: ie, if we have two up ticks, then we have 2 u of volume??
3- We have to counted this ticks and his volume and enter in one time period: ie, if we use M1 chart, we have to count the 60 previous ticks??
4- But the question is, how to have all the market between +40 and -40 because if we count ticks by this way, we still have market like pips.
Thank you very much for this interesting subject
Hi all,
about ForexGT_OscVol, we need use ticks and try to put the highest percentaje possible in a range?
So we have to normalize tick in a period = session?
I try to study the volume and their correlations. It is interesting.
Thank you very much G . Open the eyes i bit more!
Thank you very much
Hi all,
and thank you very much for this great thread and other initiates with great tips of gg53.
My question is for gg53:
ForexGT_VolumenOsc is differente for though and for peaks?
Thank you very much again
- AuthorPosts