smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Hi G,
You are right about this, i found it at Rossbot EA some months ago … tried to change some variables and functions name at that time, but as i tested it after that, i still got so success … i think i should see it again …
smallcat replied to the topic MTH – My Noob Corner Journal in the forum Trading Journals 10 years, 6 months ago
Thank you very much brother … now i remember, looking at big TF first to get overall information … then look at smaller & smaller & smaller TF … this is how our friend “vlady” at FF always did before making a decision too … Your image explains it clearly, really appreciate … Thanks

smallcat replied to the topic Filtering by Volume in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks simplex, will look at it …

smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks G, simplex, vlanFx, Tankhang, and all of you for the support.

I hope i can work again as usual soon … still trying to catch the train …

smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks G, simplex, vlanFx, Tankhang, and all of you for the support ….

I hope i can work again as usual soon … still trying to catch the train …

smallcat replied to the topic Filtering by Volume in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks a lot G
… about 5 sec bar, i assume it is not using MT4 platform ? Or is there a trick to convert tick data to get <1 minute bars ?smallcat replied to the topic MTH – My Noob Corner Journal in the forum Trading Journals 10 years, 6 months ago
Unbelieveable result brother , Zero DD with giant profit … amazing …. congratulation …

Does it based on Renko only, or combining your other tools and wait for “her” coming home ?
smallcat changed their profile picture 10 years, 6 months ago
smallcat's profile was updated 10 years, 6 months ago
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
Thanks a lot bro, i got eyes problem, so can not contribute since end of dec. Last week were my eyes better, than got small pain again, so i decided to give my eyes rest for a while. I will read from beginning again today, want to make sure that i do not miss some important posts (after a long time absent). At a glance i see that there are…[Read more]smallcat changed their profile picture 10 years, 6 months ago
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 6 months ago
This is a very nice information bro … Thanks a lot

smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Yes, you are right simplex. So, if High==Low, it means there is no Volume, right ? So, we just don’t care about this candle …. or we take the previous one ? Any idea ?
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Thanks for commission information G

Thanks brother. I just think like this :
MathPow(High – Low, -1)
does it means same as :
1 / (High – Low)
So, it is actually a division operation … if i am not wrong …
but i could be wrong though …smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi all,
I got this line of code from other thread :
double V = ( MathAbs(Open – Close) * MathPow(High – Low, -1) ) * Volume;
Just want to make sure about zero devide. If the result of (High-Low)==0.0, then the equation MathPow(High-Low, -1) will cause error. Is it right?
@pipatronic : Thanks for info about Obv Div.

smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Hi all,
I got this line of code from other thread :
double V = ( MathAbs(Open – Close) * MathPow(High – Low, -1) ) * Volume;
Just want to make sure about zero devide. If the result of (High-Low)==0.0, then the equation MathPow(High-Low, -1) will cause error. Is it right?
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
Welcome mate. I haven’t tested v 1.3 yet (will test it soon), but as you know some other features are not implemented yet in this version . But looking at your result (although it is still getting some loss), yes it is promissing. I am sure after all requirements are fullfill (peak trough, osc, trend, etc), we will see a much better result. Try…[Read more]
smallcat replied to the topic Trading made REALLY Simple: Coder's Chat in the forum Development 10 years, 7 months ago
1) will need big space (using many different file name, although we can delete it later, but that is extra work)
2) ==
3) may be can reduce conflict of read⁄write in number 2)
4) i think should be ok … the master process can be changed⁄replace by slave process after master’s job is finish (a slave becomes a master process if nee…[Read more]
smallcat replied to the topic Filtering by Volume in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 10 years, 7 months ago
[ quote=10922]
…. Alternative approach to the above mentioned: use an FIR filter instead of IIR, e.g. an ALMA. Has anybody tried that? s. [/quote] Never test it, but just got a small function that can be converted to mql4 i think : http://www.financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/
double ALMA(double &Data, int Period)
{
double m =…smallcat replied to the topic Filtering by Volume in the forum Trading Systems Discussion 10 years, 7 months ago
Never test it, but just got a small function that can be converted to mql4 i think : http://www.financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/
double ALMA(double &Data, int Period)
{
double m = MathFloor(0.85*(Period-1));
double s = Period/6.0;
double alma = 0.0, wSum = 0.0;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < Period; i++){
double w =…- Load More