Good link, thanks for this:

It makes sense to review good old resources from time to time.

Great code snippet! Is it sufficient to check this only once in OnInit(), or should it better be checked before opening or modifying an actual trade?

s.

Hi Vlan!

Good to have you back! From my point of view, partial close, moving SL to BE, trailing stop, and news are working fine.

Currently my main concern is that dynamic TP function based on ADX. I coded it according to my understanding of G.’s requirements. At the moment it progresses TP too far, because ADX will turn around too late. What…[Read more]

@kapybara:

Yes, a bit confusing! Milan, would you mind asking GP Support for an explanation of this issue? You’re the one whose account is hit by those limitations, so I think it makes sense that you would ask.

If their support does not provide a satisfactory answer, you might place your question in public via Steve Hopwood’s forum, where GP…[Read more]

Hi max,

It is not clear to me. Do you mean the indicator shared by brother Kiads ?

If you mean my indicator, it has bug, so i never share it … i am afraid it will give bad result and bring loss … it is just a “toy” for me to playing around on a demo account

cool thx m8

agrees to disagree.
PLUR
Peace Love Unity Respect
and about the topic @anti have you seen any good video’s on inside/engulfing bars?

agrees to disagree.
PLUR
Peace Love Unity Respect
and about the topic have you seen any good video’s on inside/engulfing bars?

agrees to disagree.
<h1 id=”firstHeading” class=”firstHeading” lang=”en” style=”color: black; font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; overflow: visible; padding: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #aaaaaa; font-size: 1.8em; line-height: 1.3; font-family: ‘Linux Libertine’, Georgia, Times, serif;…[Read more]

Detailed FACTS doesn’t really matter.

Semantics, Point of View, and Perspective is all that matter.

I’m gone too – to reflect on other “perspectives”…

Good luck and Green Pips.

G.

In real-life, I stay away from any kind of MA. It was just an example to show that your categoric statement is mathematically wrong.

G.

Guys,

I think this discussion is heating up mostly due to the lack of detailed facts in many arguments.

I’ve got some coding and more to do, so please don’t mind if I’m quitting here for a while.

s.

1. Volume is NOT price. In Forex, Volume is market activity – the number of transactions that causes a price to move.

2. Perspective and point of view can differ. Facts can’t.

3. Indicator can “Indicate” coming event  – or just follow price-action in a lagging manner, which make it useless. For that purpose you should use chart candles…[Read more]

MA(3) uses only the last 3 values. That’s why it’s called “Moving Average”…

G.

FX volume is price therefore price can’t precede price.
if you only use a tick chart to trade on what moves the market then. there is no vol for a tick chart because vol and price are not 2 separate entities.
this is only my perspective but i can see your perspective also. imho there is no right or wrong between perspectives

FX volume is price therefore price can’t precede price.
if you only use a tick chart to trade on what moves the market then. there is no vol for a tick chart because vol and price are not 2 separate entities.
this is only my perspective but i can see your perspective also. imho there is no right or wrong between perspectives

[ delete: posted at wrong thread. sorry … ]

Halo brother Kiads,

I am afraid that EU still will go to the south to reach 1.0992x  , or even 1.0912x  …  before she goes to north again 

But, I hope it will not go there (because i have buy orders …   ).  Any idea ?

Thanks

Halo brother Kiads,

I am afraid that EU still will go to the south to reach 1.0992x  , or even 1.0912x  …  before she goes to north again 

But, I hope it will not go there (because i have buy orders … ha..ha..).  Any idea ?

Thanks

It’s NOT semantics.

What’s the point in creating new indicator if you are just chasing price-action?

What’s the point of using just RSI (another Price-Action, and VERY lagging. BTW:CCI is better and faster for that purpose) to model Currency-Strength?

If you are into 30-40% of long-term trend, you don’t need all those fancy…[Read more]

It’s NOT semantics.

What’s the point in creating new indicator if you are just chasing price-action?

What’s the point of using just RSI (another Price-Action, and VERY lagging. BTW:CCI is better and faster for that purpose) to model Currency-Strength?

If you are into 30-40% of long-term trend, you don’t need all those fancy…[Read more]