Yes, please do.

The second type I would say is when price moves in the direction of the trend but much faster relative to it’s previous movement. Like when breaking through a “support’, dropping quickly down and then retracing back up.

Thanks for adding it
I made a post to the product improvement thread as not to clutter this one.

As to your question about two types of reversion… just from looking at the posted chart I would say one type is slow and the other one is fast? Comparing time it took price to move away vs time it took it to come back?

The sum of “Long” and “Short” profit does not equal “Both” profit. Depending on Symbol and time interval, the difference varies between + and -.

Hi Saver0,

thanks for the invite. I joined your Beta. Very currious to see what you came up with.
I trade mostly gold (XAUUSD) so was hoping to see your system’s results for this asset. But looking over the dashboard I don’t see it. Is it only available in the paid subscription plan?

Anyway, great job with this project. Will follow closely.

Vlan

Thanks a lot, guys. It’s quite interesting to see that there’s no direct relationship between the period and the lag. I don’t like to apply it in trading. However, it seems to be part of CrucialPoint’s indicators (Zero-lag MACD) that uses the Zero-lag EMA described in the paper you mentioned.

Hi, I’m not sure if this really fits here. However, I have a question in regards to Ehlers ZeroLag MA. I’ve tried to find out which lag this “zero lag” version produces in comparison to its calculation period. Unfortunately without much success. Any hints?

Enough ideas for homework over the weekend???

Definitively

Oh – I found indeed a shift in behaviour – even in my H1. The indicator window shows the H1 excess activity for a typical week in 2014 (left) and in 2017 (right) … The shift seems to happened somewhere in the beginning of Octobre 2014.

And here is the prize path-volume-structure of EURUSD in terms of the intercepts and slopes …

From the slope relation the outstanding M15 behaviour becomes even more visible.

The question is, what we now could do with these numbers …

@simplex: This evening I had some time and thus I followed your suggestion and calculated prize paths and regressions between prize path and volume for EURUD. I obtained the results listed below:

I calculated the results beginning with the smallest TF. Thus, I was amazed to see that there’s a tendency up to the H1 that for higher TFs the prize…[Read more]

Yes, it does. Even if I ignore these cases, your idea only explains less than 3 % of total variance …

Seems that the quote function doesn’t work again …

Take you time to do whatever you want ;) I know that this forum isn’t as attracting as it was two years ago since most users are very silent.

Regarding 2*(High-Low)/abs(Open-Close): I’ve tested different versions for the prize path. I think I’ve tested a similar formula, too. However,…[Read more]

I’ve thought it would be a good idea to investigate the relationship between prize movements and volume. Thus, I’ve used my way of calculating the prize path, calculated it for 603,896 M1 candles and looked at the relationship between prize path and volume:

As you can see, there seems to be a linear relation between volume and the prize path. The…[Read more]

Yes, surely. It may only give a hint. Thanks!

After studying the volume concepts laid down by GG I found this one again. After adapting and filtering with higher TF signals I obtain sometimes quite accurate turning points. However, what me really wonders is this: We can often see turning points with a high volume and a high range. How does it fit in the water flow analogy? Why should the…[Read more]

@biggy: This thread died as there was too few interest (I guess) and less advanced programmers. If the idea hasn’t been further developed in a private group, then I’d guess that everything that has been developed is in this thread …

… and here would have been the wins on EURUSD for the last 3 trading days. It’s really a shame that my dayjob hinders me to test this strategy and to make some easy pips …

@flx23: I’ve just shared some ideas that working with quite simple assumptions. I haven’t backtested them (although I did some “visual” backtesting). Thus, I surely would be interested in the results of backtests. And if you (or others) think the ideas are worth studying I think it would be a good idea to find optimal parametrs. For instance, for…[Read more]

You’re welcome. But please discuss some of your findings here (unfortunately I see that there is still not that much response to the forum activities (although there are a lot of visitors …).

However, whenever you use some longer lookback periods you’ll see that most of the time there are repainted signals on at least 2 subsequent bars ……[Read more]